Case Number
E2024-00249-COA-R3-CV
The Plaintiff sought specific performance related to a real estate transaction. The trial court denied relief, concluding that the series of papers introduced by the Plaintiff as a purported real estate contract between the parties did not constitute a valid contract. Furthermore, the trial court concluded that specific performance was inappropriate because the court could not discern the terms of the purported contract. The Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
Originating Judge
Chancellor Telford E. Forgety, Jr.
Date Filed
Download PDF Version