COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

03A01-9607-CV-00241
03A01-9607-CV-00241
Trial Court Judge: Charles S. Sexton

Sevier Court of Appeals

01A01-9607-CH-00298
01A01-9607-CH-00298
Trial Court Judge: Cornelia A. Clark

Court of Appeals

01A01-9606-CV-00284
01A01-9606-CV-00284
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

Davidson Court of Appeals

Monica R. Williams, v. Claude Williams
02A01-9604-CV-00088
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer

Claude D. Williams (Husband) appeals from the trial court’s award of rehabilitative alimony to be paid to Monica R. Williams (Wife) at $500 per month for eighteen months. This was a marriage of approximately five years duration. Wife was a junior in college attending school full-time and working two part-time jobs. She testified that her net income was $880 and her expenses $1,507 per month. Husband has an engineering degree and earns approximately $38,000 annually. No children were born to the marriage. Wife was granted the divorce on the grounds of inappropriate marital conduct.

Shelby Court of Appeals

Dept. of Children's Services vs. D.S.
M2000-02380-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge: Betty Adams Green
The parental rights of the petitioner (Mother) to her child , "R.", born January 29, 1997 during her Mother's incarceration, were terminated upon a finding that statutory grounds therefore were proved by clear and convincing evidence. Weighing very carefully the Mother's constitutional right to care for her child, on the one hand, and the best interests of the child, on the other, we vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9512-CV-00548
01A01-9512-CV-00548
Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell

Williamson Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

Huttchson vs. Cole
M1999-00204-COA-R10-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Clara W. Byrd

Wilson Court of Appeals

01A01-9606-CV-00251
01A01-9606-CV-00251
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9606-CV-00251
01A01-9606-CV-00251
Trial Court Judge: Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9607-CH-00336
01A01-9607-CH-00336
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

01A01-9601-CV-00036
01A01-9601-CV-00036
Trial Court Judge: Bobby H. Capers

Wilson Court of Appeals

01A01-9607-CV-00316
01A01-9607-CV-00316
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Rutherford Court of Appeals

01A01-9608-CH-00371
01A01-9608-CH-00371
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt

Davidson Court of Appeals

Marilyn L. Green v. Carlos Eugene Green
02A01-9601-CH-00014
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Judge George R. Ellis

In this divorce action, the trial court awarded Marilyn Green (the “Wife”) a divorce from Carlos Green (the “Husband”) upon the grounds of inappropriate marital conduct. Pursuant to a property settlement agreement, the parties agreed to sell the marital home by auction, pay the remaining indebtedness on the home and divide the proceeds equally. The parties agreed that the Wife would receive a Mercury automobile, a Ford Thunderbird automobile, the furniture, household furnishings and real estate located in the Eaton community. The parties agreed that the Husband would receive the farming equipment, guns, saddles and two pickup trucks. The trial court divided the remainder of the parties’ property and awarded the wife a one-half interest in the Husband’s retirement income and awarded the Husband a one-half interest in the Wife’s retirement income. The court further awarded each party a one-fourth interest in a fifty-seven acre tract of land in the Eaton community and awarded each party a one-sixth interest in twenty acres of corn planted as of the date of the final divorce hearing. The court further ordered that the livestock owned by the parties be sold and the proceeds divided equally. The Husband has appealed the judgment of the trial court arguing that the trial court’s division of property was improper. For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse the judgment of the trial court as to the Wife’s interest in a fifty-seven acre tract of land in the Eaton community and affirm as to the Wife’s interest in twenty acres of planted corn.

Gibson Court of Appeals

Keryn Hickerson v. Jerry Finchum - Concurring
02A01-9511-JV-00249
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Judge A. V. Mcdowell

This appeal concerns whether the appellant, Jerry Finchum (“Finchum” or “Father”), should be legally required to pay retroactive child support for his child, Elizabeth Jane Hickerson, born February 16, 1983 to the appellee, Karen Hickerson (“Hickerson” or “Mother”). The juvenile court awarded such support, in the amount of $31,080, and Finchum has appealed. For reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Shelby Court of Appeals

01A01-9607-CV-00317
01A01-9607-CV-00317
Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall

Sumner Court of Appeals

01A01-9601-GS-00021
01A01-9601-GS-00021
Trial Court Judge: Barry R. Brown

Sumner Court of Appeals

01A01-9607-CV-00328
01A01-9607-CV-00328
Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall

Sumner Court of Appeals

01A01-9607-CV-00337
01A01-9607-CV-00337
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Davidson Court of Appeals

State of Tennessee, v. John Guinn
02A01-9607-CV-00152
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Judge D'Army Bailey

This is a juvenile delinquency proceeding. Defendant, John Guinn, appeals from the order of the Circuit Court of Shelby County on a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of committing the delinquent act of attempt to commit murder in the second degree.

Shelby Court of Appeals

Elvin L. Blankenship and wife, Mary Blankenship, and Wayne Blankenship, v. Alvis Blankenship and wife, Dorothy Blankenship, and Charles Goodman and wife, Kathy Goodman
02A01-9603-CH-00051
Authoring Judge: Judge Heschel Pickens Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joe C. Morris

In this boundary line dispute the Trial Court appointed a surveyor who established a boundary line between the parties which ws adopted by the Trial Judge in the Decree in this case. Defendants has appealed, asserting the Trial Court erred in limiting their proof and in adopting the boundary established by the surveyor.

Wayne Court of Appeals

01A01-9606-CH-00256
01A01-9606-CH-00256
Trial Court Judge: Henry F. Todd

Court of Appeals