This interlocutory appeal arises out of an action in which two companies brought suit against their former attorney for legal malpractice. The attorney moved for summary judgment as to one client’s claim, contending that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations; the client responded that it learned of its cause of action within one year of the assertion of the claim. The attorney then sought through discovery to have the former client produce communications from the client’s new counsel; the client declined to produce the communications, taking the position that they were protected by the attorney-client privilege. The attorney moved the trial court to compel the client to produce the communications, and the court granted the motion, holding that the client impliedly waived attorney-client privilege in asserting that the client discovered the cause of action within the year preceding the assertion of the claim. Discerning no error, we affirm the trial court’s holding.
Case Number
M2016-00297-COA-R9-CV
Originating Judge
Judge James G. Martin, III
Case Name
Outpost Solar, LLC, Et Al. v. Henry, Henry, and Underwood, P.C., Et Al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
outpostsolar.henry_.henry_.opn_.pdf168.08 KB