Kathy L. Russell and William A. Russell v. The City of Lawrenceburg
01A01-9505-CV-00200
Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis
Trial Court Judge: Judge James L. Weatherford

Defendant, City of Lawrenceburg, has appealed from the trial court's finding that the proximate cause of the accident in which plaintiffs suffered injuries and damages was the negligence of the City of Lawrenceburg's agent and employee, Officer George L. Barturen.

Lawrence Court of Appeals

Jerry Collins D/B/A Westside Equipment Company, Inc. v. Greene County Bank
03A01-9507-CH-00216
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel Pickens Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Dennis H. Inman

In this dispute between plaintiff borrower and defendant lender, the Trial Court entered summary judgment for the defendant and plaintiff has appealed.

 

Greene Court of Appeals

Dempel Earps, v. Irene S. Earps, Ronnie Earps, and Greg Earps
01A01-9505-CH-00206
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor C. K. Smith

The plaintiff in the trial court claimed title to a disputed area of land by adverse possession. The chancellor found that the disputed property was not within the calls of the plaintiff's deed and that the plaintiff had failed to establish a prescriptive title by twenty years of adverse possession. We affirm.

Macon Court of Appeals

01C01-9504-CC-00116
01C01-9504-CC-00116
Trial Court Judge: J. S. Daniel

Rutherford Court of Criminal Appeals

01C01-9409-CR-00308
01C01-9409-CR-00308
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman

Davidson Court of Criminal Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Hamilton Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Campbell Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

01C01-9405-CC-00172
01C01-9405-CC-00172

Marshall Court of Criminal Appeals

01C01-9412-CC-00423
01C01-9412-CC-00423
Trial Court Judge: W. Charles Lee

Marshall Court of Criminal Appeals

Cyril v. Fraser
03C0l-9409-CR-0033l
Trial Court Judge: Edgar P. Calhoun

Sullivan Court of Criminal Appeals

01S01-9403-CH-00026
01S01-9403-CH-00026
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Davidson Supreme Court

CNL Insurance vs. Smith
M1999-00198-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.

Warren Court of Appeals

Kendrick Kelly v. David G. Mills, W
W2004-01106-CCA-R3-HC
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

Lauderdale Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9411-CR-00409
03C01-9411-CR-00409
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

Sullivan Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9502-CR-00057
03C01-9502-CR-00057
Trial Court Judge: William R. Holt

Jefferson Court of Criminal Appeals

Tammy R. Ganzevoort, v. Richard B. Russell, Martha T. Russell, and Jim Cassetty, D/B/A Cassetty Realty
01A01-9502-CV-00038
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Judge Thomas Goodall

The Circuit Court of Sumner County awarded the purchaser of a home a judgment against the sellers and their real estate agent, for deceptive practices as defined in the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Because we find that the evidence preponderates against a finding that the plaintiff suffered any ascertainable harm from a deceptive act, we reverse.

Sumner Court of Appeals

Walter Lee Steele and Jennie Brown, Individually and as Next-of-Kin of or Guardian of Melvin Lee Steele, Deceased, v. Tennessee Jaycees, Inc., et al.
01A01-9505-CH-00214
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor C. Allen High

The Chancery Court of Davidson County granted summary judgment to the Tennessee Jaycees and the other appellees, on the ground that the statute of limitations had passed prior to the filing of the appellants' wrongful death complaint against them. Because we do not find that the discovery rule tolls the statute of limitations under the circumstances of this case, we affirm the trial court.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Stones River Utilities, Inc., v. Metropoltian Government of Nashville, Davidison County, Tennessee, et al. - Concurring
01-A-01-9505-CH-00217
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert S. Brandt

This is a contract dispute in which the chancellor found that the uncontradicted proof showed that the plaintiff had no cause of action for the acts alleged in the complaint. We reverse on the single ground of estoppel and remand for further proceedings on that issue alone.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Gloria Keene and husband, Edward Keene, v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
01A01-9505-CV-00211
Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis
Trial Court Judge: Judge Barbara N. Haynes

This is an appeal by plaintiffs/appellants, Gloria and Edward Keene, from the trial court's order granting partial summary judgment to defendant/appellee, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. ("Cracker Barrel").

Davidson Court of Appeals

William Barry Martin, v. Marny Anne Martin
01A01-9505-CV-00222
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Judge Muriel Robinson

In this divorce case, the defendant/wife has appealed from that portion of the divorce decree which granted to the plaintiff/husband sole custody of the daughter of the parties, aged 4 1/2 years at the time of judgment, 5 years at the present time.

Davidson Court of Appeals

William Wayne Bray, v. Wanda Lee Jones Bray
01A01-9506-CV-00228
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Judge John A. Turnbull

In this case the husband has appealed the trial judge's award of $14,750 to the wife as her share of the marital property. The trial judge made the following findings: that the husband's property had increased in value during the marriage in the amount, when added to the value of some property acquired by the parties, of $34,000; that the cattle acquired by the parties had a negative value of $4,500, leaving a net value of $29,500; that the wife had made a contribution to the preservation and appreciation of the property; that the wife had a greater need than the husband; and that the husband had a greater ability to produce income in the future. Taking the net increase in the marital estate of $29,500 the trial judge then awarded half of it to the wife.

Clay Court of Appeals