Dustin Balch v. Brittanie Cilley
A mother appeals from the judgment holding her in criminal contempt of court, denying her motion to dissolve an ex parte no-contact order entered against her, and denying her motion to transfer the case to another county. Upon a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment. Due to the passage of time and the position taken by the parties and by the trial court when issuing its ruling, we remand for a new evidentiary hearing on the ex parte order suspending the mother’s contact with the children. |
Fentress | Court of Appeals | |
Quintavious Montez Patton v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Quintavious Montez Patton, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he received effective assistance of trial counsel. Based on our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court denying the petition. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Taylor Brent Farley
Defendant, Taylor Brent Farley, pleaded guilty to one count of attempted delivery of fentanyl, a Class C felony. Defendant sought judicial diversion, but the trial court denied diversion and imposed a six-year sentence on Community Corrections. On appeal, Defendant contends the trial court erred by denying judicial diversion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sequatchie | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Edward Dean v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Edward Dean, appeals the denial of his post-conviction petition, arguing |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Courtney Anderson v. State of Tennessee
This is a State appeal, filed by the State Attorney General and Reporter, from the entry of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Frederick Peat
A Shelby County jury convicted the defendant, Frederick Peat, of aggravated rape, for |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Juan De Paz Mondragon
The defendant, Juan De Paz Mondragon, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Eric Dewayne Milton
The defendant, Eric Dewayne Milton, appeals from the trial court’s revocation of his |
Carroll | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Chauncy Black
The defendant, Chauncy Black, was found guilty by a Shelby County jury of reckless |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael Notaro
Michael Notaro, Defendant, pled guilty to three counts of sexual exploitation of a minor |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Kirk Stack
The Defendant, Christopher Kirk Stack, appeals from the Knox County Criminal Court’s |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State of Tennessee v. Mark L. Ward
The Appellant, Mark L. Ward, was convicted by a Knox County jury of aggravated |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Micah Joshua Ford, Alias Joseph Tolbert, III v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Micah Joshua Ford, alias Joseph Tolbert, III, appeals the denial of his postconviction |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jeffrey Swinghold, et al. v. The Farm at Clovercroft Homeowners Association, Inc., et al.
The plaintiffs filed this breach of contract action against their homeowners association for failure to rectify alleged violations of the neighborhood restrictions. The plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment establishing that the issues complained of were actual violations of the restrictions. The trial court dismissed the action in favor of the homeowners association and the plaintiffs’ neighbors who joined as interested parties. We affirm. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Gregory L. Nelson
The Defendant, Gregory L. Nelson, appeals the trial court’s revocation of his eight-year sentence for unlawful possession of a weapon by a convicted felon. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by fully revoking his probation and ordering him to serve the remainder of his sentence in confinement. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James Paul Burkhart v. Kathryn Jean Burkhart
In this accelerated interlocutory appeal, Appellant seeks to appeal from the denial of three separate motions to recuse the trial judge. As to the first motion, we affirm the trial court’s denial of that motion on the basis of Appellant’s failure to comply with Rule 10B of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. As the second and third recusal motion, we dismiss this appeal, as no effective order denying those motions has yet been entered by the trial court. |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. $133,429 In U.S. Currency Seized From Joni Assefa Kilenton, ET AL
This appeal arises from a forfeiture action regarding funds seized during a traffic stop. In |
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Bradley Dwight Bowen
The Defendant, Bradley Dwight Bowen, appeals from his jury convictions for possession of one-half gram or more of methamphetamine with intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver; simple possession of cocaine; possession of drug paraphernalia; and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; for which he received an effective ten-year sentence. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s denial of (1) his motion to suppress the evidence seized as a result of his detention and (2) his motion to continue requesting additional time to prepare his pro se defense. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Pratik Pandharipande, M.D. v. FSD Corporation
This case arises from a dispute between a property owner and his homeowners’ association. The property owner, Pratik Pandharipande, purchased a home in a vacation community on a Tennessee lake, intending to use it as a short-term rental. At the time of the purchase, the property was subject to covenants requiring that the home be used for “residential and no other purposes.” The covenants were amended several years later to allow leases with minimum lease terms of thirty days. Pandharipande contends that neither the original covenants nor the amendments prohibit him from leasing his property for short terms of two to twenty-eight days. His homeowners’ association disagrees on both scores. We agree with Pandharipande that the original covenants requiring residential use of the property do not bar his short-term rentals, but we agree with the homeowners’ association that the amendments do. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the homeowners’ association based on both the original covenants and the amendments. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We affirm the Court of Appeals in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. |
DeKalb | Supreme Court | |
State of Tennessee v. Cedric D. Marshall, alias Edward Depriest
The defendant, Cedric D. Marshall, appeals the Davidson County Criminal Court’s order revoking his community corrections sentence and resentencing him to an effective sentence of seven years’ incarceration for his guilty-pleaded convictions of evading arrest, burglary, and theft of property. Because the defendant’s notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss the appeal. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Lorie Ann Gerbis
The Defendant, Lorie Ann Gerbis, was convicted following a bench trial of two counts of aggravated assault. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions. Specifically, she contends that the State’s evidence was inadequate to establish her identity as the perpetrator beyond a reasonable doubt. After review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Victericka Gilchrease v. State of Tennessee
The Pettioner, Victercika Gilchrease, appeals from the post-conviction court’s denial of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Raymond D. Barnes, Jr. v. Marion L. Barnes
After a long-term marriage, the parties divorced. The trial court, which found the husband’s testimony not to be credible, set the value of the marital property, divided the marital property, and awarded alimony in futuro to the wife. The husband appeals, challenging the credibility finding, the trial court’s valuation of the marital property, the division of property, and the alimony award. We affirm the trial court’s valuation and distribution of the marital property, but we vacate the trial court’s alimony award, remanding for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Will Vaughn
The defendant, Will Vaughn, appeals his Shelby County Criminal Court jury conviction of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Meredith Garrett v. Hidden Valley Homes, LLC et al.
In this breach of implied warranty of good workmanship and materials case, the trial court awarded Appellee $77,494.36 in damages. Although the parties agree that the proper measure of damages is the cost to repair the defects, the parties dispute the method of repair and its cost. In determining Appellee’s damages, the trial court relied on testimony from Appellee’s expert contractor. Discerning no error, we affirm the trial court’s order. The parties’ respective requests for appellate attorney’s fees are denied. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals |