Deborah Russell v. HSBC, Inc. et al.

Case Number
M2020-01181-COA-R3-CV
A pro se plaintiff filed a 543-page complaint containing improper allegations and claims.
The trial court struck the complaint and ordered the plaintiff to refile. The plaintiff then
filed an amended complaint of less than half the length, but containing many of the same
deficiencies as the original complaint. The court again struck the offensive portions and
ordered the plaintiff to refile. The court also dismissed several of the defendants because
the amended complaint failed to state a claim against them for which the court could grant
relief. Rather than file a second amended complaint, the plaintiff moved several times to
recuse the trial judge. Having failed to file a proper complaint within the time specified,
the court dismissed the case. We affirm.
Authoring Judge
Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge
Chancellor Anne C. Martin
Case Name
Deborah Russell v. HSBC, Inc. et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version