State of Tennessee Department of Children's Services v. Yvonne Bardin - Concurring
The parental rights of Yvonne Bardin were terminated by the Juvenile Court of Hamilton County and she appeals. Four (4) children are involved. The issue presented for review is whether the evidence is clear and convincing. We find that it is and affirm. |
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Kenneth F. Taggart and wife, Toni Corwin, v. Bart Richards and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Tennessee
This is an action for damages for personal injuries allegedly occurring on April 9, 1993 in the early evening, when the vehicle operated by the plaintiff was struck by a vehicle operated by the defendant. Upon trial, a jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff establishing damages at $8,445.00 and further determined that defendant was 51% at fault for the accident. The Trial Judge approved the verdict and plaintiffs have appealed. |
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
Volunteer Beer, Inc. vs. Johnson, Jr.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State Dept. of Children Svcs vs. Manier
|
Cannon | Court of Appeals | |
Shofner vs. Red Food Stores (TN)
|
Bedford | Court of Appeals | |
John Tigrett vs. Union Planters Bank
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Engenius Entertainment vs. W. W. Herenton, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Donald D'Amico vs. James Davenport, et al
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Dan Lomax vs. JMCGH
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Fortunes vs. Watson
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
Cook vs. Brookside
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
First American vs. Fitzgerald
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Poats vs. Nelson
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
Pait vs. City of Gatlinburg
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Whittle-Wolfe vs. Wolfe
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Mullins vs. Mullins
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Cofer vs. Cofer
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Marcella J. Cheek, v. Margaret Culpepper, Commissioner of Employment Security and Galen Internal Medicine Group, P.C.
The Appeals Tribunal and the Board of Review held that this appellee was disqualified to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily quit her job without good cause. Judicial review was sought by the appellee, and the decision of the Board of Review was reversed by the Chancellor, who found that “there was no substantial evidence to support the finding of fact that the petitioner’s shift change was temporary.” The employer appeals and presents for review the propriety of the reversal of the decision of the Board of Review. |
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Meader
|
Bledsoe | Court of Appeals | |
Alcazar vs. Hayes
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
Degrood vs. Crook's Supermarket, Inc.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Bandeian vs. Wagner
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Morris vs. Correctional Enterprises of TN.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Sensing vs. Dodson
|
Humphreys | Court of Appeals |