01C01-9610-CC-00429
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9612-CR-00528
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Watkins and Jonathan Davis
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Carlito Adams
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Vanderford
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pendergrass
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pendergrass
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jose Holmes
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Knapp
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Sprinkle vs. State
|
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Russell vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Keith Scarbrough vs. State
|
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Billy Rippy
|
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Bill Teal
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Anthony Noe
VANDALISM CONVICTION AFFIRMED; FALSE REPORT CONVICTION REVERSED |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Brenda Starks
The appellant, Brenda Starks (defendant), appeals as of right from the judgment of the trial court affirming the sentence, as amended, imposed by the General Sessions Court of Wilson County. After the defendant entered a plea of guilty to passing a worthless check, a Class A misdemeanor, she was sentenced to serve 364 days at 100% in the Wilson County Jail. Her entire sentence was suspended and she was placed on unsupervised probation. The General Sessions Court subsequently revoked the probation, and she appealed to the Criminal Court for Wilson County. The trial court affirmed the judgment of the General Session Court, but amended the judgment. The amended judgment provided for confinement in the Wilson County Jail for 364 days at 75%. In this court, the defendant contends: [T]he sentence she was given by the Criminal Court for Wilson |
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Napoleon Momon vs. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Napoleon Momon, appeals pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure from the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s denial of post-conviction relief. The petitioner was convicted in 1991 of second degree murder in the shooting death of his wife, Jacqueline Daniel Momon, and received a twenty-five-year sentence.1 His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal to this Court. State v. Napoleon Momon, No. 03C01-9205-CR-00174 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, Nov. 20, 1992). |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Willie Demorris Locust
The petitioner, Willie Demorris Locust, appeals the Dyer County Circuit Court's denial of his petition for post conviction relief. Locust is incarcerated in the Department of Correction for his convictions of aggravated sexual battery and aggravated burglary, for which he received an effective ten year sentence that he is serving consecutively to a twenty year sentence for aggravated rape and aggravated burglary and an assault sentence of undisclosed length. See State v. Locust, 914 S.W.2d 554 (Tenn. Crim. App.) (aggravated sexual battery and aggravated burglary), perm. app. denied (Tenn. 1995); State v. Willie Demorris Locust, No. 02-C-01-9404-CC-00075 (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Oct. 5, 1994) (aggravated rape and aggravated burglary), perm. app. denied (Tenn. 1995). In this appeal, he claims the lower court erred in denying him relief on three issues: 1. Whether the indictment is defective and his conviction of aggravated sexual battery is therefore void. Following a review of the record, we affirm the lower court's dismissal of Locust's petition. |
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Austin Kipling Stratton
Defendant, Austin Kipling Stratton, seeks review of his consecutive sentences totaling twenty (20) years for various drug offenses. The sentences resulted from a plea of guilty. We find that the notice of appeal was untimely filed, and no relief is merited under Tenn. R. Crim. P. 35(b). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Dmitri Johnson
The defendant, Dmitri Johnson, appeals as of right from the twenty-year sentence imposed by the Circuit Court of Montgomery County for his conviction upon a guilty plea for second degree murder, a Class A felony. The defendant contends that the trial court improperly relied upon facts not in evidence in its sentencing decision. He also contends that the trial court improperly applied three enhancement factors and refused to apply two additional mitigating factors. We believe that the case should be remanded for a new sentencing hearing. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Norman Curtis, Keith Chambers, Gina Chambers and Shelly Bragg
The State of Tennessee (state) appeals as of right from a judgment of the trial court suppressing evidence seized by law enforcement officers from the person of Norman Curtis without a search warrant, and the residences of the Chamberses and Curtis under color of a search warrant. Two issues are presented for review. The state contends there were exigent circumstances which permitted officers executing the search warrant at the Chamberses’ residence to enter the dwelling without complying with the “knock and announce” requirement. The state further contends the search of Norman Curtis’s person when he arrived at the Chamberses’ residence while the officers were executing the search warrant was reasonable. After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the law governing the issues presented for review, it is the opinion of this court that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The State of Tennessee has failed to illustrate why the evidence contained in the record preponderates against the findings made by the trial court. |
Humphreys | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Antwan Patton
The appellant, Ryan Moran (defendant), was convicted of attempted first degree murder, a Class A felony, especially aggravated kidnapping, a Class A felony, especially aggravated robbery, a Class A felony, and assault, a Class A misdemeanor. The defendant entered a no contest plea to attempted first degree murder and guilty pleas to the remaining charges. The trial court found the defendant was a standard offender and sentenced the defendant to the following Range I sentences: for attempted first degree murder, twenty-five (25) years in the Department of Correction, for especially aggravated kidnapping, twenty-five (25) years in the Department of Correction, for especially aggravated robbery, twenty-five (25) years in the Department of Correction, and for assault, eleven (11) months and twenty-nine (29) days. The trial court ordered that the sentences for attempted first degree murder, especially aggravated kidnapping, and especially aggravated robbery should be served consecutively. The sentence for assault is to be served concurrently with the other sentences. The effective sentence is confinement for seventy-five (75) years in the Department of Correction. |
Giles | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9403-CR-00110
|
Cumberland | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Belcher
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pike
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals |
