Elliot H. Himmelfarb, M.D., et al. v. Tracy R. Allain

M2010-02401-SC-S10-CV
Date / Time
Thu, 02/16/2012 - 09:00 AM
ORAL ARGUMENTS DESCRIPTION

Two physicians filed this malicious prosecution action against a former patient after she voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, a medical malpractice action she filed against them. The defendant, the former patient, moved for summary judgment asserting that the plaintiffs could not prove the essential elements of a malicious prosecution claim: that the medical malpractice suit was brought without probable cause, that it was brought with malice, and that it was terminated in the physicians’ favor. The trial court denied the motion. We have determined that the issue of favorable termination in this case involves questions of fact and law, and that fact questions concerning the circumstances surrounding the voluntary dismissal without prejudice of the medical malpractice action are in dispute. We have also determined that there are genuine issues of material fact concerning the other essential elements. Therefore, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied.

Court
Supreme Court
County
Williamson
Division
Middle Section