Case Number
01A01-9705-CV-00233
I concur in the result reached in Judge Todd’s opinion. My only reasonfor writing separately is to focus on what I perceive to be decisive in this case: the fact that the defendant did not violate a duty to the plaintiff. In that way, I avoid the nagging problem of the court apportioning fault in a case in which the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial.
Case Name
Fredrika A. Steiner v. The Parman Corporation - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
STEINER.pdf11.87 KB