This appeal involves the enforceability of the parties' oral settlement agreement. The parties, who were next-door neighbors, were involved in a lawsuit over their common boundary line. The parties appeared for depositions, but before depositions commenced, they allegedly reached a settlement and cancelled the depositions. A dispute later arose as to whether there had been a settlement of all issues in the case; the Defendants filed a motion seeking to enforce the settlement agreement. The Plaintiffs responded that there was no enforceable contract because there had been an agreement as to some, but not all, of the issues in the case. The trial court determined that there had been a settlement agreement as to all issues and ordered enforcement of the agreement. After careful review of the record, we hold that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court's determination that the parties had an enforceable agreement to settle all claims. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Case Number
E2004-02129-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Telford E. Forgerty, Jr.
Case Name
Charles Samuel Bennecker, et al. v. Howard Fickeissen, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
benneckOPN.pdf27.54 KB