Southeast Bank and Trust v. Joseph Caldarera, et al.

Case Number
E2015-00353-COA-R3-CV

In this declaratory judgment action, one of the co-defendants filed an answer and counterclaim that was dismissed by the trial court upon motion of the plaintiff. Nearly two years later, the co-defendant filed a motion pursuant to Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 59 and 60.02, seeking relief from the order dismissing his counterclaim. Said co-defendant asserted that he was never served with the motion to dismiss or the order of dismissal, despite the representation of service by mail pursuant to the certificates of service contained within those pleadings. The trial court conducted a hearing on the co-defendant's motion for relief from the earlier order, allowing the co-defendant to present evidence to rebut the presumption of proper service based on the certificates of service. The court subsequently denied the co-defendant's motion for relief from the earlier order, determining that he had not presented clear and convincing evidence to rebut the presumption of proper service. The co-defendant has timely appealed. Discerning no error, we affirm.

Authoring Judge
Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Originating Judge
Judge Jerri S. Bryant
Case Name
Southeast Bank and Trust v. Joseph Caldarera, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version