Case Number
E2016-02535-COA-R3-CV
I concur completely in the majority’s decisions pertaining to (1) the allocation of the parties’ debt; (2) the imputation of income to wife for the purpose of calculating child support; and (3) wife’s request for her attorney’s fees as alimony in solido. In my judgment, there is no error regarding any of these matters. I dissent, however, from the majority’s decision to award wife “rehabilitative” alimony rather than alimony in futuro. I do so because, I believe, the evidence clearly and overwhelmingly preponderates against the trial court’s “rehabilitative” decision.
Originating Judge
Judge Telford E. Forgerty, Jr.
Case Name
Robert Harvey Santee v. Stacy Lynn Santee - concurring in part and dissenting in part
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version