Michelle Kay (Clark) Love v. James Terrill Clark - Dissenting

Case Number
E2017-01138-COA-R3-CV

Originally, I was assigned the task of drafting an opinion in this case. I circulated my draft to the other panel judges, the Honorable W. Neal McBrayer and the Honorable Arnold B. Goldin. Judges McBrayer and Goldin do not agree with me “that the voluntary payment doctrine barred recovery.” I have read the majority opinion drafted by Judge McBrayer and concurred in by Judge Goldin. I now formally dissent from that majority opinion.

Authoring Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge Rex A. Dale
Case Name
Michelle Kay (Clark) Love v. James Terrill Clark - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion