Case Number
M2016-02214-SC-R11-CV
I agree with the majority’s clarification of the role of prejudice in the substantial compliance analysis required when a defendant challenges the plaintiff’s adherence to subsection (a)(2) of Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-121 (Supp. 2019) (“Section 121”).
Originating Judge
Judge Michael Binkley
Case Name
Melissa Martin et al v. Rolling Hills Hospital, LLC et al (Concur in Part;Dissent in Part)
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
martin.sepopn.pdf181.04 KB