This appeal involves a challenge to a chancery court’s granting of a motion to enforce a settlement agreement related to litigation over the partition of family-owned property. The appellant is incarcerated, which caused complications for all parties in efficiently resolving their dispute. The chancellor concluded the appellant was bound by the settlement reached by his agent, who was acting with both actual and apparent authority. On appeal, the appellant contends the chancellor erred in finding his agent had actual and apparent authority to agree to a settlement on his behalf. We conclude that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the chancellor erred in finding the appellant conferred actual authority upon his agent; accordingly, we affirm the chancery court’s granting of the appellees’ motion to enforce the parties’ settlement agreement.
Case Number
E2022-00230-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Elizabeth C. Asbury
Case Name
Troy Love v. Andre McDowell Et Al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
e2022-00230_love_v._mcdowell.pdf169.1 KB