Creswell vs. Creswell
03A01-9804-CH-00151
|
Court of Appeals | 05/21/99 | ||
Debyl vs. Graham
03A01-9901-GS-00015
|
Court of Appeals | 05/21/99 | ||
Pait vs. City of Gatlinburg
03A01-9808-CH-00274
|
Court of Appeals | 05/21/99 | ||
State vs. Thomas Lewis
02C01-9707-CR-00254
Originating Judge:Joseph B. Dailey |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/20/99 | |
State vs. Robert Crisp
02C01-9810-CC-00311
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood |
Hardeman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/20/99 | |
State vs. Brian Faulkens
02C01-9809-CR-00283
Originating Judge:Carolyn Wade Blackett |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/20/99 | |
State vs. Chris Eugene Etters
03C01-9801-CC-00034
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/20/99 | |
State vs. Ronald McCray
02C01-9809-CC-00292
|
Fayette County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/20/99 | |
Seymour Hayes, III. vs. State
03C01-9902-CR-00066
|
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/20/99 | |
State vs. Eddie Pittman
W2000-01582-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals his convictions for attempted second degree murder and felony possession of a weapon, arguing that he was denied his right to a unanimous jury verdict by the trial court's failure to require the prosecution to make an election of facts supporting the attempted murder. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that neither an election nor enhanced unanimity instruction was required. Thus, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Roger A. Page |
Madison County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/20/99 | |
Carden v. Roane Co.
03S01-9712-CH-00151
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff was injured in July 1993 while driving a truck during the course and within the scope of his job. The occurrence of the accident is not questioned; neither does the defendant question that the plaintiff suffered a back injury as a result of the accident. The plaintiff continued his employment with intermittent medical treatment for his back complaints. On September 1, 1995, at his residence, he stooped to pick up an object and suffered another onset of pain. The complaint was filed November 2, 1995, alleging the occurrence of the traffic accident (as a result of which periodic payments of compensation were made to the plaintiff through November 15, 1995), and subsequent physical impairment. The thrust of the defense is directed to the incident of September 3, 1995, when the plaintiff allegedly suffered the non-job-related accident at home, from which his present impairment is derived. The Chancellor found a 4 percent impairment, holding that the incident at his residence was not an intervening cause, but was merely a manifestation of problems which began in 1993. The issue is whether the evidence preponderates against the finding of the Chancellor.1 1The appellant states that the Chancellor found that "the injury sustained by the plaintiff while working at home in 1995 was causally related to a work-related injury the plaintiff had suffered two years previously." As observed, the Chancellor referred to the September 1995 event as a non-intervening incident which was merely a natural progression of the plaintiff's back problems. 2
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Frank V. Williams, III, |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 05/20/99 | |
Bethany Christian Services vs. Jackson
03A01-9810-JV-00345
|
Court of Appeals | 05/19/99 | ||
Bobby Allen Joyner vs. State
03C01-9807-CR-00260
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/19/99 | |
Atty. Gen. vs. Elk View Land & Gravel
03A01-9808-CV-00247
|
Court of Appeals | 05/19/99 | ||
Jonathan Stephenson vs. State
03C01-9807-CR-00255
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Johnson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/19/99 | |
Lee P. Fite, Individually and Derivatively on behalf of H & M Construction Co., Inc. v. Richard L. Fite, C. David Fite, Larry P. Becker, et al
02A01-9710-CH-00266
This case involves allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud in the inducement of a contract, and violation of the Tennessee Securities Act. The plaintiff asserts that the defendants, his two brothers who are majority shareholders in the family corporation, the corporation, as an alter ego or veil of the majority shareholders, and an officer and director of the corporation, used fraudulent expense and contract-kickback schemes to lower the book value of the corporation’s stock when plaintiff executed an option to sell agreement. The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants. We reverse and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Originating Judge:Chancellor Joe C. Morris |
Madison County | Court of Appeals | 05/19/99 | |
State vs. Marsha Arnold
01C01-9809-CC-00382
|
Coffee County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/18/99 | |
State vs. Juan Jerome Bryant
01C01-9805-CR-00217
|
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/18/99 | |
01C01-9806-CR-00245
01C01-9806-CR-00245
|
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/18/99 | |
Harold L. Fitts vs. State
01C01-9807-CR-00297
|
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/18/99 | |
State vs. James Wingard
02C01-9809-CC-00293
Originating Judge:R. Lee Moore Jr. |
Lake County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/18/99 | |
State vs. Patrick Trawick
02C01-9802-CR-00054
Originating Judge:Chris B. Craft |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/18/99 | |
Tim Denton vs. State
03C01-9712-CR-00536
Originating Judge:Norma Mcgee Ogle |
Morgan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/17/99 | |
03C01-9708-CR-00342
03C01-9708-CR-00342
Originating Judge:Gary D. Gerbitz |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/17/99 | |
State of Tennessee v. Leonard Edward Smith
03S01-9710-CC-00129
In this automatic appeal,1 the defendant, Leonard Edward Smith, raises numerous challenges to the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals which affirmed his sentence of death for the 1984 murder of Novella Webb. After carefully examining the entire record and the law, including the thorough opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals and the briefs of the defendant and the State, this Court entered an Order limiting review at oral argument to the following three issues:2 (1) Whether the trial court was correct in allowing the defendant to control the presentation of mitigating evidence and to waive closing argument against counsel’s advice; (2) Whether the admittance of victim impact testimony and argument at the sentencing hearing constituted reversible error; (3) Whether the sentence of death is arbitrary or disproportionate in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-206(c)(1)(A)-(D) (1997 Repl.).
Authoring Judge: Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge:Judge Lynn W. Brown |
Hamblen County | Supreme Court | 05/17/99 |