This appeal arises out of homosexual conduct in the workplace between an adult employee and a sixteen-year-old, part-time employee. After the adult employee was arrested and charged with statutory rape and contributing to the delinquency of a minor, the minor employee and his parents filed suit in the Circuit Court for Sumner County seeking damages from the adult employee and the owner of the restaurant where the minor employee and the supervisor had worked. The restaurant denied liability and among its affirmative defenses asserted the defense of consent with regard to the minor's claims and the defense of comparative fault with regard to the claims of the minor's parents. The trial court denied the minor's and his parents' motions to strike these defenses but granted the minor and his parents permission to apply for an interlocutory appeal. We granted the interlocutory appeal and now hold that the trial court correctly denied the motions to strike the restaurant's defenses.
This is a personal injury action arising from a boating accident in the Bahamas. At trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiffs appealed, alleging that the jury's verdict was not supported by any material evidence as well as alleging error with the trial court's function as thirteenth juror and with its evidentiary rulings concerning an expert witness and admission of testimony concerning non-use of life preservers by the plaintiffs. We affirm.
Knox
Court of Appeals
Philip Workman v. Donal Campbell, et al. M2001-01445-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle
This case involves the extent to which the State of Tennessee may regulate a condemned prisoner's right to be attended by his personal minister in the hours leading up to his execution. Prisoner sued the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Corrections and the prison warden based upon the warden's denial of prisoner's request that his personal religious advisor be physically present at all times leading up to his execution. The chancery court ordered the issuance of a writ of mandamus requiring the prison warden to allow the prisoner's minister to attend the prisoner at all times until the prisoner enters the death chamber. We reverse and remand.
Court of Appeals
Bobby King vs. City of Gatlinburg E2000-00734-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Telford E. Forgerty, Jr.
The Trial Court refused to entertain plaintiff's action on the grounds there was no justiciable controversy between the parties. We affirm.
Sevier
Court of Appeals
Darrell Smith vs. Chattanooga Medical Investors, Inc. d/b/a Life Care Center Chattanooga E2000-01352-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Frank Brown, III
Plaintiff's action for breach of contract for nursing home services was dismissed by the Trial Judge on Summary Judgment. On appeal, we hold plaintiff was third party beneficiary on contracts between the State of Tennessee and defendant.
Hamilton
Court of Appeals
The Weather Doctor Services Co., Inc., vs. Mark Stephens, et al E2000-01427-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Daryl R. Fansler
This is a suit in quantum meriut by The Weather Doctor Services Co., Inc., a subcontractor of David T. Goldnetz, d/b/a Architectural Custom Home Builders, Inc., against Mark Stephens and his wife Cindy Stephens. The Trial Court sustained the Stephenses' motion for summary judgment, finding that the undisputed facts did not sustain a cause of action in quantum meriut. We affirm.
Knox
Court of Appeals
Jennifer Gregg vs. Shirley McKay, Diane Farley, and Michael Floyd E2000-01754-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: O. Duane Slone
This is a suit seeking damages for sexual harassment filed by the Plaintiff/Appellant, Jennifer Gregg, in the Circuit Court for Sevier County against the Defendants/Appellees, Shirley McKay and Diane Farley. The Trial Court sustained the Defendants' motion for summary judgment . We vacate the judgment of the Trial Court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Costs of appeal are adjudged against the Defendants.
Sevier
Court of Appeals
In Re: T. M. & M.M. vs. Department of Children's Svcs E2000-01870-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
Father sought to recover for childcare services ordered to be furnished by the Department of Children's Services in the Juvenile Court of Sevier County. The Circuit Court dismissed the Petition, but approved an award of attorney fees. On appeal, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
Blount
Court of Appeals
State Farm Ins. Co. vs. Charles Schubert, et al E2000-02054-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.
State Farm Insurance Company filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination as to its liability under the uninsured motorist ("UM") coverage of an automobile insurance policy issued to Charles Schubert. Schubert and his wife had obtained judgments against an uninsured motorist totaling $330,000. Of this amount, Schubert was awarded $260,000 for his injuries. His wife, Clara Schubert, was awarded $70,000 for loss of consortium. At the time of the automobile accident that gave rise to the underlying claims, Schubert was acting within the course and scope of his employment; as a result of his injuries, he received workers' compensation benefits of $89,518.08. We are asked to decide how much of the UM single-person coverage limit of $100,000 is payable in view of the language of the following provision of the policy as it applies to the UM coverages:
Anderson
Court of Appeals
Anna Williams vs. James Williams, II E2000-03005-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: William R. Brewer
In this post-divorce case, Anna M. Williams ("Mother") filed a petition against James K. Williams, II ("Father"), seeking a modification of the parties' divorce judgment, which judgment, inter alia, had awarded the parties joint custody of their minor daughter, Ashlyn Brooke Williams (DOB: July 20, 1996). The petition sought an alteration of Father's visitation schedule and an increase in Father's child support obligation. In response, Father filed, inter alia, a petition for change of custody. The trial court found a substantial and material change in circumstances and awarded Father sole custody of Ashlyn. We reverse.
Blanche Bunch vs. Robert Sharp E1999-02524-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Conrad E. Troutman, Jr.
In this boundary line dispute, the Trial Judge established the boundary between the parties' lands and Plaintiff has appealed. We affirm.
Claiborne
Court of Appeals
Allied Sound, Inc. vs Eddie Neely & Johnny Davis E2000-01095-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: O. Duane Slone
In this action alleging misrepresentation, concealment and fraud, the Trial Court granted defendants summary judgment on the grounds that it was unreasonable for plaintiff to rely on any representations made by defendants. On appeal, we affirm.
Sevier
Court of Appeals
E2000-01095-R3-CV E2000-01095-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: O. Duane Slone
Sevier
Court of Appeals
Audie Lowe, et al vs. Bill Goad, et al E2000-02056-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Billy Joe White
Audie Lowe, Hilda Lowe, and Sheilda Mills ("Plaintiffs") brought this boundary line suit against members of their family, Bill Goad, Mattie Goad, Eugene Olmstead, and Mae Olmstead ("Defendants"). Plaintiffs allege their predecessor-in-title, Arlie Overton, had an agreement with Defendants' predecessor-in-title, Sherman Overton, that a fence ("Fence") would serve as the boundary line. Plaintiffs' deed does not include the disputed area up to the fence. After a trial, the Trial Court dismissed Plaintiffs' complaint, holding that the Fence was not the boundary line by agreement or acquiescence. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.
Scott
Court of Appeals
Randall B. Coward vs. Blount County E2000-02378-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
Randall B. Coward ("Plaintiff") was incarcerated in the Blount County jail after being charged with DUI. Plaintiff claims he was sitting on the bed in his cell when the mattress shifted causing him to fall to the floor, landing on his head. Plaintiff says there was a full size mattress on a twin size frame with the mattress extending over the frame by six to eight inches. Plaintiff sued alleging negligence and/or gross negligence on the part of Blount County ("Defendant"). Defendant filed a summary judgment motion and attached the affidavits of the Sheriff of Blount County and a deputy sheriff. Both of these individuals swear that there were two styles of mattresses in the jail, and both styles fit the bed frames. In response to the summary judgment motion, Plaintiff filed his own affidavit which stated that the mattress extended over the frame by six to eight inches and was a full size mattress on a twin size frame. The Trial Court granted Defendant's summary judgment motion. We conclude there is a genuine issue of material fact, and, therefore, vacate the judgment.
Blount
Court of Appeals
Loreta MCCollum, et al vs. James Connatser E2000-02561-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
On May 9, 1997, Alleen C. McCroskey ("the decedent") passed away, leaving two children, Loretta C. McCollum and James W. Connatser, Jr. McCollum, individually and as administratrix of the decedent's estate, filed suit against her brother, claiming that Connatser, as a result of undue influence on the decedent and/or conversion, wrongfully obtained monies that now rightfully belong to the decedent's estate. The trial court granted Connatser summary judgment, and McCollum appealed. We vacate the grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
Blount
Court of Appeals
Steven Hull vs. Susan Hull and Garth Eddy E2000-02696-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: O. Duane Slone
In this action to recover proceeds on life insurance policies required by a divorce decree for the children, the Trial Judge held the children were entitled to the proceeds, rather than the beneficiary named in the policies. We affirm.
Jefferson
Court of Appeals
James Crawford vs. Ray Thomason, et al M1998-00926-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III
This appeal stems from a hostile work environment claim involving the Department of Streets and Signs of the City of Murfreesboro. After enduring approximately three years of racial harassment by his immediate supervisors, an employee of the Department of Streets and Signs filed suit in the Chancery Court for Rutherford County against the City of Murfreesboro, the city manager, and his two supervisors seeking damages and injunctive relief under the Tennessee Human Rights Act. The City moved for summary judgment, pointing out that the offending supervisors had been terminated less than one month after the employee brought their conduct to the attention of the public works director. The trial court granted the summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. The employee has appealed. After reviewing the record in light of the principles announced in Parker v. Warren County Util. Dist., 2 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. 1999), we have determined that the City is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment.
Rutherford
Court of Appeals
Doris Tipton vs. Elizabeth Quinn M1998-00951-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray
This is a breach of contract case involving agreements for Defendant to board and breed Plaintiff's horses for a share of the resulting foals. Shortly after the parties entered into an oral agreement, Defendant memorialized the agreement in a handwritten note. The agreement was subsequently reduced to more detailed writings by Plaintiff, which both parties signed. Plaintiff later claimed that Defendant breached portions of the agreement which required her to timely breed the mares, provide insurance, adequately care for and maintain the horses, provide adequate veterinary care for the horses, allow inspection of the horses, and halter-break foals. Defendant claimed that the agreement prepared by Plaintiff did not reflect the parties' original oral contract. The trial court granted Plaintiff partial summary judgment on the portion of her breach of contract claim alleging that Defendant failed to obtain insurance. After a bench trial, the court awarded Plaintiff compensatory damages for breach of contract as well as attorney's fees. Defendant appeals those decisions. We affirm as modified.
