03A01-9608-CV-00251
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9609-CH-00300
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9611-CV-00345
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9606-CV-00145
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9605-CV-00166
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Samson vs. Hartsville Hospital
|
Trousdale | Court of Appeals | |
Loria vs. Loria
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Livingston, et. al. vs. Upper Cumberland Human
|
DeKalb | Court of Appeals | |
Young vs. Young
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Jackson vs. Corrections Corp. of America
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Jackson vs. Corrections Corp. of America
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Frank Rudy Heirs Assoc. vs. Moore & Assoc .
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Thomas v. White
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Garrett vs. McDougle
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Terry vs. Niblack
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9511-CV-00253
|
Benton | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9512-CH-00269
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9601-CV-00009
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9601-CV-00009
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02a01-9605-CH-00101
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9606-CH-00144
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9609-CV-00289
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Lue Ann Smith, v. Winchester City Council, et. al.
This is an appeal by petitioner/appellant, Lue Ann Smith, from an order of the Franklin County Circuit Court quashing her writ of certiorari. The writ suspended the decisions of respondent/appellee, the Winchester City Council (“the Council”), allowing intervening petitioner, Karl Smith, permission and denying Appellant permission to sell fire works within the City of Winchester. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows. |
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
Ila Stephens Bertram v. Charles R. Gernt, Estate of Bruno Gernt, Inc. Champion International Corporation, Hood Coal Company, et. al .
The plaintiff filed suit to establish present title to land in Fentress County that had previously belonged to her family. The Chancery Court dismissed her suit on the ground that she lost whatever interest she had in the land through foreclosure. After examining the record and the briefs of the parties, we find that the trial court did not err in dismissing the suit, and we affirm. |
Fentress | Court of Appeals | |
Randall Myers v. Hurst Construction Company, Inc.
The Trial Court and this Court have granted permission to the Hurst Construction Co., Inc., to appeal from an interlocutory order of the Trial Court overruling the motion of Hurst Construction Co., Inc., for summary judgment on grounds of the statute of limitations. |
Rutherford | Court of Appeals |