01C01-9603-CC-00093
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Joseph Chidester and wife, Kathleen Chidester v. L. D. Elliston, O.D.
In this medical malpractice action, the Plaintiffs, Joseph and Kathleen Chidester, 2 filed suit against the Defendant, Dr. L. D. Elliston, for failing to diagnose the Plaintiff’s malignant tumor. The trial court granted the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment holding that the Plaintiffs’ cause of action is barred by the one year statute of limitations. The Plaintiffs’ have appealed the trial court’s order arguing that the statute of limitations does not bar this action because the Plaintiffs’ cause of action did not accrue until the Plaintiff’s malignancy recurred. For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse the judgment of the court below and remand. |
Tipton | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Curtis Newbern
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9510-CC-00323
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9512-CC-00422
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9601-CR-00027
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9603-CR-00113
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9604-CR-00129
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9604-CR-00147
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03C01-9406-CR-00205
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9602-CC-00070
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9602-CR-00086
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Criss Williams
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William Jerry Flippin, Jr., v. A. O. Smith Automotive Products Company
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers'Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 50-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employer questions the award of permanent partial disability benefits as being excessive and contends the award should be to the first phalange of the thumb rather than to the thumb. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be modified. |
Gibson | Workers Compensation Panel | |
01C01-9511-CC-00388
|
Warren | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9601-CC-00047
|
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9505-CC-00138
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9602-CR-00057
|
Monroe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9603-CC-00108
|
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9606-CC-00213
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Sherry Denise Thearp Ervin, v. Dale Edward Ervin
This is an appeal from a Final Decree of Divorce entered January 5, 1996. Plaintiff, Sherry Denise Thearp Ervin (Wife), appeals from the order of the trial court granting her an absolute divorce from the defendant, Dale Edward Ervin (Husband). 1 In her first issue, Wife argues that the trial court should have awarded her the parties’ ski boat. We will consider this assertion with the second issue. 2 Wife appeals the trial court’s decision concerning the division of the marital property, the amount of child support, and the denial of an award of attorneys’ fees. |
Hardeman | Court of Appeals | |
01C01-9602-CC-00065
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9604-CC-00168
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals |