State vs. Christie Thomas
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Doris Howard v. Sterling Plumbing Group, Inc.
|
Obion | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Gloria Rooker v. Zurich Insurance Co.
|
Shelby | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Bobby White v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber
|
White | Workers Compensation Panel | |
William Hall vs. Don Shaw
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Smith
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Douglas Rains
|
Benton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Douglas Rains
|
Benton | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9802-CH-00035
|
Weakley | Court of Appeals | |
Wiley Hutcherson vs. Rozell Carter
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
Wanda Barker vs. James Barker
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
Sullivan vs. Baptist Memorial Hospital
|
Supreme Court | ||
Sullivan vs. Baptist Memorial Hospital
|
Court of Appeals | ||
GRE Insurance Group vs. Reed
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Graham, et al vs. Edmondson
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Willette Newsom v. Murray, Inc.
|
Madison | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Willie Lane Shannon v. Sipco Services & Marine, Inc., et al
|
Benton | Workers Compensation Panel | |
State of Tennessee vs. James Richard Watson
The defendant, James Richard Watson, appeals from his sentence imposed for aggravated assault, a Class C felony, in the McMinn County Criminal Court. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-102(a)(1)(B) (1997). The trial court imposed a five year sentence in the Tennessee Department of Correction. In this direct appeal, the defendant challenges the length of the sentence imposed and the manner of service. After a review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we affirm the sentence. |
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. David Eugene Smith, Jr.
The appellant, David E. Smith, Jr., appeals the verdict of a Davidson County jury finding him guilty of one count of theft of property over $1,000, a class D felony. For this offense, the appellant received a two year suspended sentence. On appeal, the appellant challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence and contends that the trial court erred by denying his request for judicial diversion. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Anand Franklin
The appellant, Anand Franklin, was convicted by a Davidson County jury of one (1) count of aggravated sexual battery, a Class B felony. The trial court sentenced him as a Range I offender to eight (8) years incarceration. On appeal, the appellant claims that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. After a thorough review of the |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Louis Lavergne
The appellant, Louis Lavergne, pled guilty to the offense of voluntary manslaughter in the Davidson County Criminal Court.1 Pursuant to the plea agreement, both the length of the sentence and the manner of service were submitted to the trial court for determination. The trial court subsequently imposed a four year sentence to be served in the Department of Correction. In this appeal, the appellant challenges both the length of the sentence and the trial court’s denial of a sentencing alternative to total confinement. After a review of the record, the appellant’s four year sentence is affirmed, however, the manner of service is modified to reflect a split confinement sentence of six months confinement in the local jail or workhouse with the remainder of the four year sentence to be served on supervised probation. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Terry Wayne Hayman
Defendant, Terry Wayne Haymon, appeals as of right his convictions by a Dyer County jury on three counts of aggravated robbery. Honorable J. Steven Stafford sentenced the defendant to concurrent terms of thirty years as a career offender. The following issues are presented for our review: 1. whether the evidence is sufficient to support the convictions;
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Lamar Fletcher
This matter is before the Court upon motion of the state to affirm the judgment of the trial court by order rather than formal opinion. See Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. This case represents an appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is currently serving a life sentence, having been found to be an habitual criminal in 1985. In his present petition, the petitioner claims that his conviction is void because his trial attorney worked as a Public Defender and Assistant District Attorney at the same time. |
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William K. Buchanan Jr., v. Kathy Young and Donnie Young - Concurring
The plaintiff, a resident of Hawaii, contracted to buy D & K Auto Salvage from the defendants in August 1994, for $450, 000.00. He employed Tom Gargone to manage the business. |
Rhea | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Charles R. Smith
A Hardeman County jury convicted defendant of aggravated burglary, a Class C felony, and theft of property valued at $500, a Class A misdemeanor. The sole issue in this appeal as of right is sufficiency of the evidence. We find the evidence sufficient to support the convictions and AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court. |
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals |