Please enter some keywords to search.
| State vs. Robert Eugene Finchum
E1999-00696-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant Robert Eugene Finchum, Jr., pled guilty to one count of simple possession of LSD, one count of simple possession of marijuana, one count of possession of untaxed whiskey, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, Defendant received a total effective sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days with 30% minimum service prior to eligibility for work release, furlough, trusty status, and rehabilitative programs. Following a hearing, the trial court denied Defendant's request for probation. Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it failed to impose an alternative sentence. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge:James E. Beckner |
Hawkins County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/14/00 | |
| State vs. Billy Bivens
E1999-00086-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Billy Bivens, was convicted of official misconduct and assault. On appeal, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions;that the trial court erred by failing to require the state to elect the offenses for which it sought conviction; that the jury delivered inconsistent verdicts; and that the trial court imposed an excessive sentence. Because the jury was erroneously instructed on assault as a lesser included offense of sexual battery, we reverse the assault conviction. The conviction and sentence for official misconduct are affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade
Originating Judge:Earle G. Murphy |
McMinn County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/14/00 | |
| State vs. Ira Ray Crouch
E1999-02320-CCA-R3-CD
Having pled guilty to two counts of statutory rape, the defendant now challenges his sentence. He argues that the trial court improperly denied his motion for judicial diversion. We affirm his sentence of five years on probation.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| State vs. Richard Korsakov
E1999-01530-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Richard Korsakov, appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of an intoxicant, third offense. He contends that (1) the breath test results were inadmissible because the officer administering the test failed to observe him for twenty minutes; (2) the photocopies of certification and maintenance records were inadmissible for lack of compliance with the rules of evidence; (3) he should have been allowed to cross-examine the officer on the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test for the purpose of impeachment; (4) a sealed, miniature bottle of cognac was irrelevant and, therefore, inadmissible; (5) the trial court improperly commented upon the evidence by instructing the jury to disregard the address on an exhibit's tag; and (6) the cumulative effect of the errors at trial prejudiced him. Because we hold that the results of the breath test are inadmissible, we reverse the judgment of conviction and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Douglas A. Meyer |
Hamilton County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| State vs. Frederick Cavitt
E1999-00304-CCA-R3-CD
While incarcerated in the Tennessee Department of Correction, the defendant was indicted for aggravated assault, pled guilty to the lesser included offense of simple assault, and received a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days. The defendant moved for pretrial jail credits, in the amount of three hundred and twenty-one days, calculated from the day the arrest warrant was served to the day the judgment was entered. We conclude that the defendant is not entitled to the claimed jail credits and therefore affirm the trial court's order dismissing the defendant's Motion to Modify Judgment to Reflect Jail Credits. We modify the sentence to indicate service in either the Carter County Jail or workhouse.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Robert E. Cupp |
Carter County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Joseph Spottswood Crowell vs. Mayme Modena Roberson
E1999-00348-COA-R3-CV
The appellee has filed a petition for rehearing pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 39. In the first ground of his petition, he asserts that we made a mistake in computing the "[a]djustment re: North Carolina property" reflected on page 8 of our opinion. The appellee is in error in this assertion. We purposely utilized an adjusting figure of $141,915 rather than $140,447.50 -- the latter figure being fifty percent of the value of the marital property share of the North Carolina property. The larger figure was a "plug" figure used to achieve equality in the overall division of the parties' marital property. Since it will be necessary to transfer funds to consummate this division, we deemed it equitable in this case to equally divide the parties' marital estate. The trial court found that equality was equitable and the evidence does not preponderate against this finding.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Frank V. Williams, III |
Roane County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Dept. of Children's Services v. T.L.C.
M2003-00509-COA-R3-JV
In this appeal the Appellant, R.L.P, Sr., argues that the Trial Court erred in terminating his parental rights to his son, R.L.P., Jr. We vacate the judgment of the Trial Court and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Timothy R. Brock |
Coffee County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Douglas Kirkham, Jr. vs. State
M2004-02635-CCA-R3-HC
The petitioner appeals the summary dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. Specifically, he alleges fatal deficiencies in the indictment; an involuntary, unintelligent, and unknowing guilty plea; an illegal and void sentence; and ineffective assistance of counsel. Upon review, we conclude that the petitioner has not presented any claims that justify habeas corpus relief. Therefore, we affirm the summary dismissal of the habeas corpus petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:Jane W. Wheatcraft |
Sumner County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| City of Murfreesboro vs. Pierce Hardy Real Estate, Inc.
M2000-00562-COA-R9-CV
This case involves a dispute between the City of Murfreesboro and a landowner over the value and the acreage of a tract of land taken by the city to be used for a greenway along the Stones River. The city appeals the trial court's denial of a motion in limine that the city filed to exclude testimony of the landowner's appraiser. The motion stated that the expert's testimony relied on an inadmissible method of valuation and should, therefore, be excluded. Additionally, the landowner appeals the trial court's ruling that the landowner did not own a .61 acre portion of the of the land taken because, as it sits at the bottom of a navigable waterway, it is not subject to private ownership.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Robert E. Corlew, III |
Rutherford County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| In the Matter of the Estate of S.W. Brindley
M1999-02224-COA-R3-CV
This is a will contest between two siblings. After the onset of the parties' father's final illness, during which his competence was questioned and eventually a conservator appointed, the father executed a codicil to his will that materially altered the distribution of his estate in favor of his son, the appellant herein. The testator's daughter challenged the validity of the codicil in the underlying action. After the jury found that the codicil was not the testator's "own free act," but was instead the result of undue influence on the son's part, the codicil was declared a nullity. We affirm the jury's verdict.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Stella L. Hargrove |
Giles County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| State, ex rel Boren vs. Town of Orlinda
M1999-02240-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from property owners' quo warranto challenge to an ordinance annexing their property. Property owners allege that the annexation was not reasonably necessary for their health, safety, and welfare and for the annexing municipality. Prior to trial, the trial court denied Defendant's motion in limine which sought to exclude testimony of the property owners, a comparison of the services offered by the annexing municipality and a neighboring municipality interested in annexing the disputed area, evidence regarding the public hearing on annexation, and evidence of the annexing municipality's other annexations. The jury returned a verdict for Plaintiffs, finding the annexation was not reasonable, and the trial court entered judgment thereon. Defendant appeals.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:James E. Walton |
Robertson County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Vonkrosigk vs. Rankin
M1999-02254-COA-R3-CV
Buyer in real estate sale contract contingent on obtaining the financing sued for return of earnest money after she failed to qualify for a loan to finance to purchase. The trial court found that buyer acted in good faith in attempting to secure financing and entered judgment for buyer. Sellers have appealed.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Don Ash |
Rutherford County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Geldreich vs. Hall
M1999-02258-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a suit initiated by Geldriech ("Investors") alleging breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and conversion by Hall in his capacity as corporate officer. When Hall failed to answer and appear for hearing, Investors' motion for default judgment was granted. Thereafter, Hall filed a motion to strike the default judgment that was denied by the court below. Hall appeals the trial court's failure to grant him relief from the default judgment.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Leonard W. Martin |
Dickson County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Murphy vs. Martin
M1999-02273-COA-R3-CV
The trial court dismissed this negligence action for the failure to prosecute. On appeal the plaintiff asserts that she did not have adequate notice that her lawsuit was in jeopardy. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Borders vs. Crow
M1999-00985-COA-R3-CV
This is a suit by employee for compensation allegedly due after discharge under oral contract of employment. Upon finding that the discharge was for cause, the jury nevertheless returned a verdict for the employee for post-discharge compensation. On the employer's appeal, we vacate that part of the judgment awarding post-discharge compensation.
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Russo vs. Russo
M1999-02380-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from an action for divorce initiated by Donald Joseph Russo ("Husband") against Debra Ann Russo ("Wife"). The trial court granted Wife an absolute divorce and alimony in futuro; awarded custody of the parties' minor children to Wife; ordered Husband to pay child support in the amount of thirty-two hundred dollars per month with additional child support of two thousand dollars per month to be placed in educational trust for parties' minor children; and awarded the majority of marital assets to Wife. Husband appeals.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Tom E. Gray |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| In the Matter of T.S. and M.S.
M1999-01286-COA-R3-CV
This case involves the termination of parental rights regarding two children who were removed from the parental home by the Department of Children's Services in 1995 and placed in foster care. The mother was ordered to take steps to remedy the deficiencies in the home and made some efforts to comply. After four years, DCS petitioned to terminate the mother's parental rights. The trial court found that the mother had failed to substantially comply with the Plan of Care and terminated the mother's rights on grounds (1) that the conditions that led to the children's removal continued to persist with little likelihood of remedy and (2) that the mother was incompetent to adequately provide for the children. Because DCS has established grounds for termination and has also established that termination is in the best interest of the children, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Ben Hall Mcfarlin |
Rutherford County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Hobbs vs. Hobbs
M1999-00715-COA-R3-CV
Two years after a divorce, and eight months after the divorce decree was affirmed on appeal, the former husband filed a pro se motion asking the trial court to review new evidence and to find that he had been defrauded and denied his constitutional rights in the divorce proceeding. The trial court treated the pleading as a motion under Rule 60, Tenn. R. Civ. P., and held that the motion was (1) untimely and (2) not supported by the proof submitted by the movant. We affirm the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Thomas W. Graham |
Sequatchie County | Court of Appeals | 07/13/00 | |
| Penny Pitt Phillips, et al. v. Robinson & Belew, Inc., et al.
W1999-02211-WC-R3-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _5-6-225 (e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The defendant-employer and its insurance company appeal the judgment of the Weakley Chancery Court insisting that the trial judge erred in commuting the death benefits payable to Donald Leon Pitt, a minor, to a lump sum. As discussed below, the panel has concluded that the part of the trial court's judgment that ordered the award be commuted should be reversed.
Authoring Judge: Weatherford, Sr. J.
Originating Judge:William Michael Maloan, Chancellor |
Weakley County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/13/00 | |
| Eddie Brannon v. Pen Gulf, Inc.
03S01-9906-CH-00053
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Travelers Insurance Company (hereafter "Travelers") appeals the granting of summary judgment dismissing Reliance Insurance Company (hereafter "Reliance") as a party defendant before trial. Travelers asserts that the trial court erred in finding that the last injurious exposure rule did not create an issue of whether Reliance, as a subsequent workers' compensation insurance carrier for Pen Gulf, Inc., may be liable for Eddie Brannon's injury. An appeal from a summary judgment in a workers' compensation case is not governed by the de novo standard of review provided by Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6- 225(e)(3), but by Rule 56, T.R.C.P. Downen v. Allstate Ins. Co., 811 S.W.2d 523, 524 (Tenn. 1991). No presumption of correctness attaches to decisions granting summary judgment because they involve only questions of law and the reviewing court must determine whether the requirements of Rule 56 have been met. Gonzales v. Alman Const. Co., 857 S.W.2d 42, 44-45 (Tenn. 1993). Summary judgment is proper when the movant demonstrates that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56.3, T.R.C.P. In considering a motion for summary judgment, the court must take the strongest legitimate view of the evidence in favor of the nonmoving party, allow all reasonable inferences in favor of that party, and discard all countervailing evidence. Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 28, 21 (Tenn. 1993). "It is almost never an option in workers' compensation cases. In a summary judgment hearing, even where the parties have no right to a jury trial, the trial judge is not at liberty to weigh the evidence." Hilliard v. Tennessee State Home Health Services, Inc., 95 S.W.2d 344, 345 (Tenn. 1997). Eddie Brannon filed this action on March 23, 1998 to recover workers' compensation benefits for "bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome which was caused by the 2
Authoring Judge: Special Judge Howell N. Peoples
Originating Judge:Hon. Jerri Bryant |
Knox County | Workers Compensation Panel | 07/12/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Joseph S. Burris, Jr.
01C01-9907-CC-00247
Originating Judge:J. Steve Daniel |
Rutherford County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/12/00 | |
| State vs. Michael S. Reid
M1999-00305-CCA-R3-CD
The Williamson County grand jury indicted the appellant, Michael S. Reid, with one (1) count of driving under the influence, third offense, one (1) count of driving on a revoked license and one (1) count of criminal impersonation. The appellant pled guilty to driving on a revoked license and criminal impersonation and, after a jury trial, was found guilty of driving under the influence, third offense. The trial court sentenced the appellant to concurrent terms of eleven (11) months and twenty-nine (29) days, suspended after service of 180 days, for driving under the influence, third offense and six (6) months, suspended after service of ten (10) days, for driving on a revoked license. In addition, the appellant received a consecutive sentence of six (6) months, suspended after service of five (5) days, for criminal impersonation. On appeal, the appellant argues that the trial court erred in (1) admitting hearsay evidence over his objection by allowing a Williamson County Sheriff's Deputy to testify as to the contents of a dispatch he received prior to stopping the appellant; and (2) allowing the state to introduce evidence concerning a prior stop of the appellant for which he was not charged. We hold that the officer's testimony concerning the dispatch was nonhearsay and relevant and, as a result, properly admissible. Additionally, we conclude that the appellant has waived the issue regarding the prior stop as a result of his failure to object to this evidence at trial and his failure to include this issue in the motion for new trial. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/12/00 | |
| Hudgens vs. Rogers
M2000-00239-COA-R3-CV
The mother of four minor children appealed the trial court's decision to change custody from Mother to Father based on a material change in circumstances. Prior to the entry of that order, it had been determined that an agreement, originally announced to the court which awarded custody of the children to Mother, had been set aside due to the court's finding that there had been no meeting of the minds of the parties as several critical issues had been left unresolved. We have determined that the court was correct in that decision. Therefore, the standard which the trial court should have applied was one of comparative fitness and best interest of the children rather than a material change of circumstances. This matter is reversed and remanded to the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Arthur E. Mcclellan |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 07/12/00 | |
| State vs. Ronald Wayne Ashby
M1999-01247-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals his aggravated burglary conviction. He asserts that insufficient evidence supported the jury verdict, that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of another crime, and that his sentence is excessive. We conclude that sufficient evidence supported the verdict and that the "other crime" evidence was properly admitted. We affirm the sentence.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:William Charles Lee |
Lincoln County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/12/00 | |
| State vs. Seria D. Ward
M1998-00128-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted in Davidson County of especially aggravated robbery and sentenced to confinement for seventeen years. He appealed the conviction, alleging that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of the offense, that his videotaped confession should have been excluded, and that his trial counsel was ineffective. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:Thomas H. Shriver |
Davidson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 07/12/00 |