Clark Earls vs. Shirley Earls
M1999-00035-COA-R3-CV
This extraordinary appeal involves the efforts of one party to effectuate an opinion of this court which the Tennessee Supreme Court declined to review. On the first appeal, this court reversed portions of the trial court's final decree and remanded the case with specific directions regarding the details of the order to be entered. After the Tennessee Supreme Court denied the wife's application for permission to appeal, the husband asked the trial court to enter an order consistent with the directions in this court's opinion. After conducting two hearings, the trial court declined to enter the proposed order. We have granted the husband's application for an extraordinary appeal because the trial court, by its refusal to enter a judgment consistent with this court's opinion, has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings that immediate review of its actions is required. We now (1) vacate the trial court's orders filed after March 29, 2001, (2) direct the clerk of the trial court to enter this opinion and the order accompanying it as the final order in this proceeding, and (3) direct that this case be assigned to another judge in the Twenty-First Judicial District for any further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 05/31/00 | |
Limbaugh vs. Coffee Medical Center
M1999-01181-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:John W. Rollins |
Coffee County | Court of Appeals | 05/31/00 | |
Clark Earls vs. Shirley Earls
M1999-00035-COA-R3-CV
This extraordinary appeal involves the efforts of one party to effectuate an opinion of this court which the Tennessee Supreme Court declined to review. On the first appeal, this court reversed portions of the trial court's final decree and remanded the case with specific directions regarding the details of the order to be entered. After the Tennessee Supreme Court denied the wife's application for permission to appeal, the husband asked the trial court to enter an order consistent with the directions in this court's opinion. After conducting two hearings, the trial court declined to enter the proposed order. We have granted the husband's application for an extraordinary appeal because the trial court, by its refusal to enter a judgment consistent with this court's opinion, has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings that immediate review of its actions is required. We now (1) vacate the trial court's orders filed after March 29, 2001, (2) direct the clerk of the trial court to enter this opinion and the order accompanying it as the final order in this proceeding, and (3) direct that this case be assigned to another judge in the Twenty-First Judicial District for any further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 05/31/00 | |
Clark Earls vs. Shirley Earls
M1999-00035-COA-R3-CV
This extraordinary appeal involves the efforts of one party to effectuate an opinion of this court which the Tennessee Supreme Court declined to review. On the first appeal, this court reversed portions of the trial court's final decree and remanded the case with specific directions regarding the details of the order to be entered. After the Tennessee Supreme Court denied the wife's application for permission to appeal, the husband asked the trial court to enter an order consistent with the directions in this court's opinion. After conducting two hearings, the trial court declined to enter the proposed order. We have granted the husband's application for an extraordinary appeal because the trial court, by its refusal to enter a judgment consistent with this court's opinion, has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings that immediate review of its actions is required. We now (1) vacate the trial court's orders filed after March 29, 2001, (2) direct the clerk of the trial court to enter this opinion and the order accompanying it as the final order in this proceeding, and (3) direct that this case be assigned to another judge in the Twenty-First Judicial District for any further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman |
Williamson County | Court of Appeals | 05/31/00 | |
Richardson vs. TDOC
M1999-02796-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 05/31/00 | |
Charles McDonald vs. Dixie White Ishee
W1998-00258-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/31/00 | |
Beatrice Holiday vs. Shoneys South
W1999-01173-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:John R. Mccarroll, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/31/00 | |
State vs. Murriel Lee
W1999-01094-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Lee Moore |
Dyer County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
Ronald & Bonnie Warf vs. Wayne Vincent
W1999-01542-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Walter L. Evans |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
Barnes vs. Goodyear
W1997-00247-SC-R11-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:W. Michael Maloan |
Obion County | Supreme Court | 05/30/00 | |
Ricky Lee Jenkins v. Heather Johnson
M2001-02103-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from the lower court's modification of a child custody arrangement. The trial court found that a material change in circumstances had occurred and awarded primary residential custody to Father. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the lower court.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Clara W. Byrd |
White County | Court of Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
Berryhill vs. Rhodes
W1997-00167-SC-R11-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:Kenneth A. Turner |
Shelby County | Supreme Court | 05/30/00 | |
Berryhill vs. Rhodes
W1997-00167-SC-R11-CV
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge:Kenneth A. Turner |
Shelby County | Supreme Court | 05/30/00 | |
21812-COA-R3-CV
21812-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge:Jeffrey F. Stewart |
Sequatchie County | Court of Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
State of Tennessee v. Edward Talmadge Mcconnell
E1998-00288-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Originating Judge:Arden L. Hill |
Washington County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
Tammy C. Powell vs. Charley Crisp, et al
E1999-02539-COA-R3-CV
This is a suit wherein Tammy C. Powell, formerly Bird, seeks custody of her minor children, Joshua Daniel Bird (DOB 2/2/86) and Cherish Richelle Bird (DOB 8/25/88), who are now in the custody of her parents. The Trial Court was of the opinion that the Court of Indian Offenses of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, located in Cherokee, North Carolina, the Court which initially awarded a divorce to Richard Bird and later granted custody of the children to the maternal grandparents, Charley and Peggy Crisp, had exclusive jurisdiction of any action seeking to change custody, and accordingly dismissed the petition. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Jerri S. Bryant |
Bradley County | Court of Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Brown
W1999-00298-CCA-R3-CD
T he D efendant w as indicted for one count of agg ravated robbery and one count of theft over $1,000. He w as subsequently tried by a T ipton C ounty jury and found guilty of aggravated robbery and theft over $500. In this appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred by allowing introduction of an involuntary statement which he made to police following his arrest, by failing to grant his motion for new trial on the basis of insufficient evidence, and by sentencing him incorrectly. We hold that the trial court did not err by admitting the Defendant’ s statement to police, that the evidence was sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction, and that the Defendant was properly sentenced. Accordingly , we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Judge Joseph H. Walker |
Court of Criminal Appeals | 05/30/00 | ||
Larry W. Barnes v. The Goodyear Tire And Rubber
W2000-01607-COA-RM-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:W. Michael Maloan |
Obion County | Court of Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
State vs. England
M1997-00254-SC-R11-CO
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Jane W. Wheatcraft |
Sumner County | Supreme Court | 05/30/00 | |
In re: Appalachian School of Law
M2000-00053-SC-BLE-CV
|
Supreme Court | 05/30/00 | ||
Wielgus vs. Dover Industries
M1999-00173-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Robert E. Corlew, III |
Rutherford County | Court of Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
Chadwell vs. Chadwell
M1999-00675-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Jane W. Wheatcraft |
Sumner County | Court of Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
Speakman vs. Ada Ferrell Garden Apts.
M1999-00509-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:L. Craig Johnson |
Coffee County | Court of Appeals | 05/30/00 | |
State of Tennessee v. Dennis R. England
M1999-00254-SC-R11-CO
Originating Judge:Jane W. Wheatcraft |
Sumner County | Supreme Court | 05/30/00 | |
Thomas Gregory v. American Manufacturers Mutual Ins.
M1999-00403-SC-WCM-CV
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. Sec. 5- 6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Plaintiff/Appellee filed suit in the Chancery Court for Sumner County for workers' -2-
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
|
Sumner County | Workers Compensation Panel | 05/29/00 |