APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
B&G Construction vs. Polk, et al

M1999-00677-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Barbara N. Haynes
Davidson County Court of Appeals 04/18/00
Ray vs. State

M1999-00237-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Frank G. Clement, Jr.
Davidson County Court of Appeals 04/18/00
State vs. Andrew Charles Helton

M1999-01405-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant, Andrew Charles Helton, was indicted, along with co-defendants Shirley Crowell and Shayne Cochran, for two counts of premeditated murder and two counts of felony murder for the shooting deaths of Robert Cole and Michael Chatman. After the trial court granted a motion for a judgment of acquittal on the felony murder charges, the Defendant was convicted by a jury of first degree murder for the death of Robert Cole and of second degree murder for the death of Michael Chatman. The Defendant was sentenced to mandatory life imprisonment for the first degree murder conviction and to twenty-three years imprisonment for the second degree murder conviction. The Defendant now appeals and argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain his convictions. The Defendant also contends that the trial court erred in admitting certain crime scene and autopsy photographs into evidence. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we find no merit to the Defendant's contentions and thus affirm his convictions.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Seth W. Norman
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/18/00
State vs. Harold Wayne Shaw

M1999-01119-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant, Harold Wayne Shaw, was convicted by a Davidson County jury of second-degree murder and aggravated kidnapping in 1996. The trial court sentenced the defendant as a Range II offender to serve eighteen (18) years for the aggravated kidnapping and thirty-five (35) years for the second-degree murder, both sentences to be served consecutively. Following the defendant's direct appeal, this Court affirmed the defendant's conviction but remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing because the trial court mistakenly sentenced the defendant as a Range II, persistent offender, misapplied two statutory enhancement factors, and failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law sufficient to support the imposition of consecutive sentences. The trial court then resentenced the defendant as a Range I, standard offender to serve ten (10) years for the aggravated kidnapping and twenty-two (22) years for the second-degree murder. The court again ordered the sentences to be served consecutively. On appeal, this Court finds (1) that the length of the defendant's sentence is appropriate, and (2) that although the record does not support the trial court's finding that the defendant is a professional criminal, the trial court was correct in finding that the defendant has an extensive criminal history; thus consecutive sentences are also appropriate. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:Seth W. Norman
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/18/00
Cherry vs. Williams

M1997-00216-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Barbara N. Haynes
Davidson County Court of Appeals 04/17/00
Lusk vs. Englett

M1999-00294-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris
Lewis County Court of Appeals 04/17/00
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Supreme Court 04/17/00
State vs. Carter

W1997-00248-SC-R11-CD
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Jon Kerry Blackwood
McNairy County Supreme Court 04/17/00
Stephen Comella vs. City of Memphis

W1999-00347-COA-R3-CV
This is a personal injury case involving the on-the-job injury of a police officer working for the City of Memphis. The city admitted liability. After a bench trial on the issue of damages, the trial court awarded the plaintiff a judgment of $25,000. The plaintiff appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by treating this as a worker's compensation case rather than a negligence case. Plaintiff also argues that the trial court erred by not granting his request for discretionary costs to pay for expert witness fees. We affirm, finding that the evidence supports the trial court's award and that there was no abuse of discretion in declining to order the city to pay the plaintiff's expert witness fees.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:Kay Spalding Robilio
Shelby County Court of Appeals 04/17/00
Joseph Patton vs. Michael Kruszewski

W1998-00133-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Walter L. Evans
Shelby County Court of Appeals 04/14/00
State vs. Victoria S. Galindo

M1999-00768-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/14/00
State vs. Darrell Dodson

M1998-00067-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge:Leon C. Burns, Jr.
White County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/14/00
State vs. Robert Allen Leggett

M1999-01066-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge:Cheryl A. Blackburn
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/14/00
State vs. Frederick James Brush

M1999-00622-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Robert E. Burch
Stewart County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/14/00
State vs. Alton Darnell Young

M1999-01166-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Seth W. Norman
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 04/14/00
Brenda Reese vs. Rickie Reese

M1999-02429-COA-R3-CV
The defendant, an incarcerated felon, appeals the action of the Chancellor in granting a divorce to his wife and settling all property rights between the parties. We affirm the judgment of the Chancellor
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Tyrus H. Cobb
Bedford County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
Marilyn E. Reel vs. George C. Reel, Jr.

M1999-01151-COA-R3-CV
This is a divorce case ending a twenty-seven year marriage. The trial court made an essentially equal division of property, awarding Wife the marital residence which remained unfinished even though the parties had occupied it since 1985. We modify the property division to provide Wife additional funds with which to complete and repair the residence.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:James T. Hamilton
Maury County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
Old Republic Surety Co. v. Morris Eshaghpour

M1999-01918-COA-R3-CV
The defendant purchased a building permit bond from the plaintiff surety company and executed an indemnity agreement to hold the surety harmless against all loss, liability and expenses the company might sustain on the bond. A claim was made against the bond regarding a home built by the defendant. The surety company notified the defendant, investigated the claim, and eventually settled with the claimant. In this lawsuit to collect under the indemnity agreement, the trial court granted summary judgment to the surety. The defendant argues that summary judgment was inappropriate because the motion was not properly supported according to the Rules of Civil Procedure and, alternatively, the issue of whether the surety acted reasonably and in good faith in settling the claim precludes summary judgment. We disagree and affirm the summary judgment on the issue of liability, but remand for proof on total damages.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Walter C. Kurtz
Davidson County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
Barbara Vargo v. Lincoln Brass Works

M1999-00734-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves a dispute between an employee and her former employer over severance pay. After the employee obtained a $13,750 judgment in the Metropolitan General Sessions Court of Davidson County, the employer perfected a de novo appeal to the Circuit Court for Davidson County. Following a bench trial, the trial court concluded that the employee had a vested right to severance pay under the employer's severance policy and awarded the employee $15,262.50. The employer has appealed. We have determined that the employer's severance policy contained an enforceable contractual obligation to pay severance pay to eligible employees. In the absence of proof that the employee was ineligible, we find that the trial court correctly interpreted and applied the severance policy. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Carol L. Soloman
Davidson County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
Jeffery Tolbert vs. Dept. of Correction

M1999-02387-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from an action challenging the calculation of sentence reduction credits for an inmate in the custody of the Department of Corrections. After the inmate filed a petition claiming that he had been denied such credits, Department filed motion for summary judgment supported by an affidavit stating that Inmate's sentence had been properly calculated. Inmate failed to respond in a manner as required by Rule 56.06 Tenn. R. Civ. P. to establish that any genuine issues of material fact existed. As a result, trial court granted summary judgment motion. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge:Ellen H. Lyle
Davidson County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
David Rivkin vs. Lori Postal

M1999-01947-COA-R3-CV
This appeal involves the financial aftermath of a short-lived nonmarital affair that ended badly. The man filed suit in the Chancery Court for Williamson County seeking a partition of the jointly-owned property and the return of his personal property. The woman responded with a counterclaim for breach of promise to marry. Following a bench trial, the trial court divided the jointly-owned property and awarded the woman $150,000 in damages on her breach of promise claim. Both parties now take issue with the judgment. The man asserts that the evidence does not support awarding the woman $150,000 or granting the woman such a large share of the jointly-owned property. The woman takes issue with the reduction of her share of the property because of damage to the man's personal property while it was in her possession. We have determined that the evidence does not support the trial court's conclusion that a promise to marry existed or that the woman was damaged by the failure of the marriage to take place. We have also determined that, with the exception of a cedar chest belonging to the man's grandmother, the manner in which the trial court divided the parties' jointly-owned property was proper.
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman
Williamson County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
Lisa Ann Vaccarella vs. Raymond M. Vaccarella

M1999-01937-COA-R3-CV
The unusual procedural history of this case presents for review the validity of the parties' marital dissolution agreement ("MDA") and the subsequent divorce decree entered by Judge Henry Denmark Bell incorporating this MDA, as well as the court's decision regarding child custody, support, and visitation. After Wife filed Rule 59 and 60.02 motions for relief from her MDA, the second trial judge, Russ Heldman, determined that Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-4-103(b) requires a hearing prior to incorporating the signed marital dissolution agreement into a decree granting the parties an irreconcilable differences divorce. Judge Heldman further found the MDA to be invalid due to duress and violations of Wife's due process rights and vacated Judge Bell's decree granting the parties' divorce. We overrule the trial court on these issues and find the MDA signed by the parties, as well as the January 31, 1998 decree of Judge Bell granting final divorce, to be valid. We thus reinstate both the MDA and original decree. With regard to the issues of custody, visitation, and child support, we find substantial change in circumstances and affirm Judge Heldman's determinations on these issues.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Russell Heldman
Williamson County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
Clark vs. Farrell

M1999-01945-COA-R3-CV
This is an appeal by the defendant from an action of the trial court in assessing discretionary costs against the defendant. The trial court entered an order of dismissal with prejudice on finding that "the parties have settled all matters in controversy . . ." which order was approved for entry by counsel for both parties. The plaintiff filed a motion for discretionary costs pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.04(2). The trial court then granted discretionary costs to the plaintiff in the amount of $2,185.75. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Robert L. Holloway
Maury County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
Max Pass vs. Shelby Aviation

W1999-00018-COA-R9-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:D. J. Alissandratos
Shelby County Court of Appeals 04/13/00
Pamela Sweat vs. James Sweat

W1999-00158-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge:Bob G. Gray
McNairy County Court of Appeals 04/13/00