Sevier County, Tennessee, Et Al. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization, Et Al.
This is an administrative property tax appeal concerning the classification of real property |
Court of Appeals | ||
In Re A.W. Et Al.
Mother appeals the trial court’s termination of her parental rights as to two of her children. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Katrina Greer ET AL. v. Fayette County, Tennessee Board of Zoning Appeals ET AL.
Appellants filed a petition for common law writ of certiorari, seeking judicial review of |
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
Thomas Stephen Goughenour, Jr. v. Marion Michelle Goughenour
This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce involving the trial court’s award of parenting time and requiring parental restrictions. The trial court entered a permanent parenting plan in which Mother and Father were awarded equal parenting time, with Father being named the primary residential parent. The trial court also ordered that neither Father nor Mother were to consume alcohol in the presence of Child. Father appeals. Having carefully reviewed the record, we affirm the trial court’s order. We further award Mother her attorney’s fees on appeal and remand to the trial court for a determination of the amount awarded. |
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
In Re Parker F. Et Al.
A father appeals the termination of his parental rights to two children. The trial court concluded that the petitioners proved four statutory grounds for termination by clear and convincing evidence. The court also concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence that termination was in the children’s best interest. After a thorough review, we agree and affirm. |
Robertson | Court of Appeals | |
Torrance Taylor v. Board of Administration, City of Memphis Retirement System
This appeal concerns a Memphis police officer’s application for a line-of-duty disability |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Torrance Taylor v. Board of Administration, City of Memphis Retirement System -Dissent
The majority thoughtfully examines the evidence in the present case and may even |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Stephen Charles Johnson v. Elizabeth Kay Johnson
Because the order appealed from does not constitute a final appealable judgment, this Court |
Court of Appeals | ||
The State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Joan Ross Westerman Et Al. v. Peggy D. Mathes Et Al.
The trial court granted Defendants/Appellees’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of Plaintiff/Appellant’s proof. Discerning no error, we affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In Re Isaiah W. Et Al.
This is a dependency and neglect case concerning two minor children. Appellee Tennessee |
Court of Appeals | ||
James L. Henry, Jr., Et Al. v. Elizabeth P. Casey Et Al.
This appeal stems from the trial court’s dismissal of two creditors’ claims against the |
Court of Appeals | ||
Joel C. Riley Et Al. v. Hector G. Jaramillo Et Al.
This is a dispute involving the usage and subdivision of real property in McMinn County. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Alyssa Vandyke v. Lilly Cheek ET AL.
We granted this extraordinary appeal to determine whether the Governmental Tort Liability Act, Tennessee Code Annotated sections 29-20-307 and 29-20-313(b), requires severance in cases involving both non-governmental and governmental entities. Following the legislature’s amendment of these statutes in 1994, we conclude that, when a jury is demanded, the entire case against both non-governmental and governmental entities shall be tried to a jury without severance. |
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Emma Glover v. Paul Duckhorn
At issue is whether Tennessee Code Annotated § 28-3-104(a)(2) extends the statute of |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Meredith Lee Taylor v. Christopher Bryan Taylor
This is a divorce action filed by Meredith Lee Taylor (“Mother”) against Christopher Bryan Taylor (“Father”). The trial court divided the marital estate nearly equally and granted Mother primary residential custody of the parties’ child. Father was granted 130 days per year of parenting time. Father appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in its valuation of several marital assets. He also asserts that the trial court should have awarded him more parenting time. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Lincoln | Court of Appeals | |
Wayne C. Lance v. Alcoa Hotel Hospitality
Because the order appealed from does not constitute a final appealable judgment, this Court |
Court of Appeals | ||
In Re Nevaeh S.
A mother appeals from the termination of her parental rights to her child on the ground of |
Court of Appeals | ||
Stacey Lee (Boyett) v. Brett Carr Boyett
A father appealed an order requiring his children to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. While the appeal was pending, both children received the vaccine. Because we determine that the appeal is moot, we dismiss the appeal. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Fred Hayward v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hospital Authority d/b/a Erlanger Health System Et Al.
This health care liability action was brought against a hospital and a physician. The |
Court of Appeals | ||
Jane Doe v. John David Rosdeutscher, M.D., Et Al.
All of the claims asserted in this action arise from a prior healthcare liability action in which Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”) sued Dr. John Rosdeutscher and his medical group for damages resulting from breast reduction surgery. In the action now on appeal, the complaint asserts claims for invasion of privacy, abuse of process, intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress, and breach of contract against Dr. Rosdeutscher, his medical group, and the attorneys who represented them in the prior healthcare liability action. All of Plaintiff’s claims pertain to the fact that the defendants filed Plaintiff’s medical records in the healthcare liability action, which included nude photographs of Plaintiff and details about her sexual and mental health history—information that Plaintiff contends had “nothing to do” with her healthcare liability claims. The defendants responded to the complaint by serving a Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 11 notice on Plaintiff’s counsel. Shortly thereafter, the defendants filed a Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02 motion to dismiss all claims on various grounds. The trial court granted the Rule 12 motion, dismissed all claims, and assessed $10,000 in damages pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 20-12-119 against Plaintiff. The trial court also assessed Rule 11 sanctions against Afsoon Hagh, Plaintiff’s attorney, in the additional amount of $32,151.67. Plaintiff appealed; her attorney did not. Finding no error, we affirm. We also find this appeal to be frivolous and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, including a determination of the reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees and expenses incurred by the defendants in defending this appeal and entry of judgment thereon. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In Re Conservatorship of Kimelah M.
Appellant appeals the decision of the probate court to name other parties as the conservators of her daughter on the basis that the trial court improperly placed time limitations on the presentation of proof at the final hearing. Because Appellant has failed to show any reversible error in the trial court’s decision, we affirm. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Ben C. Adams v. Buchanan D. Dunavant, et al. v. Watson Burns, PLLC, et al.
Two law firms seek accelerated interlocutory review of the denial of their motion to |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
21st Mortgage Corporation v. Catrina Ford ET AL.
This case involves a dispute over a parcel of real property. Because of the profound |
Court of Appeals | ||
Dora Bannor v. Philip Bannor
This appeal arises from a divorce case. The wife filed a complaint for divorce alleging |
Court of Appeals | ||
Craig Charles, Et Al. v. Raymond Keith McCrary, Et Al.
The trial court clerk notified this Court that a final judgment has not been entered. This |
Court of Appeals |