Jon Hall v. Bill McLesky, et al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Jimmy Wilson v. State
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Johnetta Nelson v. Innovative Recovery Svcs. Inc.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Florence Harrell
|
Union | Court of Appeals | |
Ricky W. Mcelhaney v. Howard B. Barnwell
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Ricky McElhaney vs. Howard Barnwell
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Services v. D.G.S.L.
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
In the Matter of: C.J.S.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Kathie King v. Billy King
|
Giles | Court of Appeals | |
Sharon Kaye Outten v. Russell Campbell
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Dept. of Children's Svcs. vs. Jeri Layne
|
Grundy | Court of Appeals | |
Martin Walker vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Alfred Bibbins, a/k/a Ed Owens vs. T.R. Gunn
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Thelia Barrett v. White House Utility District
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Ray White v. Regions Financial Corp.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ralph Alley, et al vs. Quebecor World Kingsportet al
|
Hawkins | Court of Appeals | |
12-98-044-CC
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
James O'Neal Vineyard, et ux. v. Walker Betty, et ux.
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: D.M.S., G.H.S., and T.M.S.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee, Department of Children's Services, v. Jennifer Lee Netherton Whited, et al.
This appeal involves the termination of parental rights. The juvenile court terminated the parental rights of both parents. Appellant/mother challenges the juvenile court’s termination of her rights contending the juvenile court erred by allowing in certain documentary evidence, that the evidence did not clearly and convincingly establish that termination was in the child's best interest, the court failed to state affirmatively that termination was in the best interest of the child, and the petition for termination was defective as it did not explicitly state the statutorily mandated language of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-113(d)(3)(C) (Supp. 2000). As discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the juvenile court. |
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Cedric Franklin v. Tennessee Department of Correction
A prison disciplinary board found a minimum security prisoner to be guilty of violation of state law. The prisoner filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, claiming that the board had denied him due process. The trial court dismissed the petition. We affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Billy R. Sadler v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole
A prisoner who was denied parole filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, challenging, on constitutional grounds, the procedures followed by the Parole Board. The trial court dismissed the petition. We affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Sue S. Plemmons v. Mike Graves, et al.
This case involves whether Mike and Bonnie Graves d/b/a/ GRESCO ("Defendants" or "Lessees") breached a commercial lease with Sue S. Plemmons ("Plaintiff" or "Lessor"). The lease was entered into in 1983 and permitted the installation of a billboard on Plaintiff's property. Plaintiff claims Lessees breached the lease when they paid the rent for 1999 late and when they refused to pay an increase from $250 to $1,500 in the annual rent. The Trial Court held that Lessees did not breach the lease and dismissed the case. We affirm. |
Monroe | Court of Appeals | |
Ricky Riddle, et al. v. Heartland Nursery Company
In this action to collect the purchase price for the sale of nursery stock, the buyer alleged that the goods did not conform to the contract and that the number of units delivered was significantly short of the number specified in the invoice. The buyer also filed a counterclaim for the damage to its professional reputation resulting from the seller's breach. The Circuit Court of Franklin County resolved all the issues in favor of the seller and rendered judgment for the balance of the purchase price. Because we find that the buyer had accepted the goods and failed to carry his burden of proving that they were defective, we affirm. |
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
El-Shabazz Ahkeen v. Donal Campbell, et al.
A state prisoner appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition for writ of certiorari seeking judicial review of sanctions imposed in prison disciplinary proceedings. He asserts the proceedings denied him due process and that the board's failure to follow Department of Correction policies and procedures constituted an illegality under state law grounds for common law writ of certiorari. We affirm the trial court and hold (1) the sanctions imposed did not trigger due process protections, (2) the alleged failure to follow specific procedures did not amount to failure to follow the essential requirements of the law in the context of prison disciplinary proceedings, and (3) there was evidence to support the board's finding. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |