Constance/Marcus Cherry vs. State W2001-00038-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
This is a wrongful death case. The decedent was a patient at a state mental health institution. He died at the institution because he was not properly treated for urinary problems. The mother of the decedent filed this wrongful death action against the State, seeking damages for the decedent's loss of earning capacity, pain and suffering, as well as her loss of consortium. The complaint was later amended to add the decedent's son as a plaintiff. The son sought damages only for his loss of consortium. After a hearing, the Tennessee Claims Commission denied the mother any damages for wrongful death, holding that persons of unequal kinship cannot both maintain a wrongful death action relating to the same death. However, the Claims Commission awarded the mother her out-of-pocket funeral expenses, and awarded $25,000 to the son for his loss of consortium. The mother and son now appeal. We affirm, finding that, as between the mother and son of the decedent, the son has the greater degree of kinship with the decedent, and therefore the mother cannot be awarded damages for the decedent's wrongful death.
Court of Appeals
Eva Woods vs. County of Dyer W2001-00224-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Lee Moore
This appeal arises from the Appellees' denial of an application for a beer permit filed by the Appellant. The Appellant filed a petition for writ of certiorari against the Appellees in the Circuit Court of Dyer County. Following a hearing on the petition for writ of certiorari, the trial court affirmed the decision of the Appellees and dismissed the petition for writ of certiorari. The Appellant appeals the dismissal of the petition for writ of certiorari by the Circuit Court of Dyer County. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the trial court's decision.
Dyer
Court of Appeals
Myrtle Brown vs. Norma Daly W2001-00953-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Floyd Peete, Jr.
This appeal involves the disputed ownership of real property. Appellee claims title to the land by prescription, or in the alternative, under the doctrine of laches. After a jury trial, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of Appellee. Appellants assert that the trial court erred by admitting a check into evidence as proof that Appellee's predecessor in interest lived on the property without the permission of Appellants. We agree that the trial court erred by admitting the check, but we affirm the judgment of the trial court because the record contains material evidence to support the jury's findings and corresponding verdict.
Grace Fellowhip Church vs. Lenoir City Beer Bd. & KVAT Food Stores, Inc. E2000-02777-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Frank V. Williams, III
The Trial Court voided Beer permit issued by the Beer Board. We vacate the Trial Court's Judgment and remand to the Board to reconsider the application on grounds the Board's actions were in violation of the Open Meetings Act.
Loudon
Court of Appeals
Patricia Parks vs. Julie Nelson E2000-02943-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
In this appeal from the Blount County Circuit Court the Plaintiff/Appellant, Patricia D. Parks, contends that the Trial Court erred in granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendants/Appellees, Julie Nelson and Nelson Realtors/ Better Homes and Gardens, Inc. Ms. Parks also contends that the Trial Court erred in failing to grant her motion for continuance and in failing to grant her motion to accept a late filed deposition. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court and remand the case for collection of costs below.
Blount
Court of Appeals
State, ex rel Steven Wrzesniewski, vs. Lori Miller E2001-00317-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
Appellant was not ordered to pay child support when divorce was granted. Subsequently, retroactive child support was ordered. On appeal, we affirm.
Blount
Court of Appeals
State ex rel. Benjamin Bowman, et al vs. City of Elizabethton E2001-00597-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: G. Richard Johnson
In this condemnation suit the landowners, whose property was originally proposed to be annexed but later excluded, appeal the Trial Judge's determination that they have no standing to prosecute the suit contesting the annexation. Other landowners who were in the original annexation ordinance and remained therein after the amended ordinances excluding realtors, sought to intervene and contest the City's right to annex. Their suit was likewise dismissed upon a finding by the Trial Court that they had not filed an exception within the 30-day period allowed by Statute. We affirm the Trial Court's resolution both as to the Realtors and the parties attempting to intervene.
Carter
Court of Appeals
Anthony McNabb, et ux vs. Highways, Inc., et al E2001-00867-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Lawrence H. Puckett
Plaintiffs' action for damages for personal injury allegedly due to defendant's negligence, was dismissed by the Trial Judge for failure of plaintiffs to join all alleged tort feasors in one action. On appeal, we vacate and remand.
Polk
Court of Appeals
Sam Mirabella, et al vs. State E2001-00960-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
This is a suit by Sam Mirabella and his son Charles Mirabella and their wives, seeking damages against the State of Tennessee and the University of Tennessee for damages incurred as a result of the unlawful arrest of both Mr. Mirabellas and negligence resulting in injury to Sam Mirabella. The Trial Court found it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unlawful arrest claim and awarded damages for the injury to Sam Mirabella in the amount of $4528 and to his wife in the amount of $800. As to Sam Mirabella we modify the judgment to increase the award to the sum of $11,528 and as to his wife $1800.
Court of Appeals
Mark Wishon, et ux vs. Ear, Nose, & Throat Associates, PC., et al E2001-01031-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Thomas J. Seeley, Jr.
Plaintiffs appeal from summary judgments in medical malpractice case granted to defendants, and from the Trial Court's refusal to grant them a voluntary dismissal during the pendency of the summary judgment motions. We affirm.
Washington
Court of Appeals
Terry Brough vs. Muriel Adcroft W2001-00786-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown
This appeal involves a trial court's grant of prejudgment interest on arbitration awards. Subsequent to an automobile accident, the plaintiffs filed suit against their uninsured motorist policy carrier and another individual involved in the accident. The case proceeded to arbitration and the plaintiffs were awarded $140,000.00, which was paid by the insurance company. Upon obtaining new counsel, the plaintiffs learned of a relationship between the arbitrator and the insurance company and motioned the court to vacate the arbitration award. The trial court granted plaintiff's motion and resubmitted the case for a second arbitration. The plaintiffs were awarded $245,000.00 at the second arbitration and, soon after, motioned the court for prejudgment interest on the award. The trial court awarded the plaintiffs $71,042.72 of prejudgment interest. The insurance company appealed the decision to grant prejudgment interest and both parties have contested the method of calculation employed by the trial court. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Robert Smith vs. Warden Larry Craven W2001-00955-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood
Petitioner appeals from the trial court's order denying Petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari. We affirm.
Hardeman
Court of Appeals
In re: The Estate of Luther Garrett M1999-01282-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Billy Joe White
The testator, a father of six, left a will which devised to one of his children a specific tract of land which, according to the will, was described in an attached survey map. No survey map was attached to the will. Appellant, the recipient of that bequest, disagreed with his siblings about the size of the tract to which he was entitled. After hearing both parties' evidence, the trial court found that the testator's intent was to devise separate seven acre tracts to both Appellant and one of his brothers with the remainder of the estate's property to be divided equally among the six children. Appellant then commenced this appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Fentress
Court of Appeals
Joanne Barrett vs. Christopher Barrett M2000-00380-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Royce Taylor
In this divorce appeal the wife asserts that the trial judge erred in awarding custody of the children to the father, in refusing to award her rehabilitative alimony, and in the division of the marital estate. We affirm the trial court.
Rutherford
Court of Appeals
Sheila Byrd vs. David Buhl M2001-00070-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano
This appeal involves a custody and visitation dispute brought by divorced parents having joint custody of their child. After the mother of the child moved out of state, the child's father petitioned the court for change of custody. The mother then counter-petitioned the court for an increase in child support. After a hearing on the matter, the court altered the previous visitation agreement, increased child support, granted the father the right to claim the child as a dependent for income tax purposes, and refused to grant the mother attorney's fees. This appeal followed and for the following reasons, we affirm.
Montgomery
Court of Appeals
James E. Gunter v. U.C.H.R.A. and Kristi A. Poore M1999-01591-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Conrad E. Troutman, Jr.
In this appeal, the appellant, Mr. Gunter, filed a claim for personal injury and property damages against a local governmental entity in general sessions court. The governmental entity orally moved to dismiss citing the Tennessee Governmental Tort Liability Act, which grants exclusive jurisdiction over these cases to the circuit court. The general sessions court denied the motion and transferred the case to circuit court, and that court dismissed the action based on the statute of limitations. Mr. Gunter now appeals the dismissal of his case by the circuit court.
Fentress
Court of Appeals
Eileen Dunloy v. Brian Dunloy M2000-03103-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Lee Russell
Marshall
Court of Appeals
Eileen Dunloy v. Brian Dunloy M2000-03103-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Lee Russell
Marshall
Court of Appeals
Charles Moore v. Clyde Green M2000-03203-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge John J. Maddux, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Frank G. Clement, Jr.
This appeal involves a dispute concerning the estate of Nellie K. Ellis. The plaintiffs, Charles W. Moore, Linda Moore Maggart (Executrix of the estate of Herschel Moore, deceased), Ray Swing, Juantia Swing Sircy, Jeane S. Pennington, and James E. Swing, contested the decision to admit the will to probate. Their position is that the will is invalid because of a train of circumstances which shows the will was (1) not properly executed, (2) the testator lacked sufficient mental capacity, or (3) the beneficiary exercised undue influence over the testator. The trial court granted the defendant Clyde Green summary judgment, holding that the will was properly executed and that the plaintiffs did not adequately prove undue influence or lack of mental capacity. We affirm the trial court's decision.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
M2001-00095-COA-R3-CV M2001-00095-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Frank G. Clement, Jr.
Thomas Roache vs. Justine Bourisaw M2000-02651-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano
This case involves a non-custodial parent's petition for change of custody. The original marital dissolution agreement granted the mother full custody of the child and the father alternate weekends and holidays and two weeks each summer. The mother later moved to Missouri, and the parties adjusted visitation accordingly. Later, the father filed and was granted a contempt motion due to the mother's failure to allow him to see the child. He subsequently filed a motion for change of custody which was also granted. The court found that the circumstances warranted the change of custody. The mother appeals. We affirm the trial court's change of custody.
Montgomery
Court of Appeals
Kurt Seraphine v. Aqua Bath M2000-02662-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Claudia C. Bonnyman
This is an appeal from the grant of Appellees' motion for summary judgment. Appellant, a former employee of Appellee company, brought various claims against the company, and the company's top executives. Against the company, Appellant sought damages and specific performance based on an alleged breach of a stock option agreement and damages for breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. Against the individual defendants, Appellant sued on claims of statutory and common law inducement to breach. Appellees counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment that Appellant had no option to purchase shares in the company because the option expired when his employment terminated. Summary judgment was granted on Appellees' declaratory judgment claim and Appellant's claims were dismissed. We reverse the trial court's holding that the stock option expired with termination of employment, but find Appellant has not demonstrated a breach of the stock option agreement or his right to any remedy thereunder. We affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment on the breach of duty of good faith and intentional interference claims.
