X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Creative vs. Bale
|
Campbell | Court of Appeals | |
State DHS vs. Rogoish
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Ravenwood vs. Franklin
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
James Jones, et al vs. Randall Harris, et al
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
Steve/Lori Eldridge vs. City of Trenton, TN
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
W2001-01724-COA-R3-JV
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Bruce Hutton, et al vs. City of Savannah, TN
|
Hardin | Court of Appeals | |
Decatur Co. Bank vs. Welborn Duck, et al
|
Decatur | Court of Appeals | |
Adams TV of Memphis vs. Comcorp of TN, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Joseph Leibovich, et al vs. The Kroger Co., et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Carol Strong vs. Timothy Strong
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Steve & Tammy Carroll vs. J.R. Roach
|
McNairy | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9702-
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Kireyczyk, et. al. vs. MF Athletic Club
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Tate vs. TN. Bd. of Paroles & Myers
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Young vs. Young
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
William Key vs. Julian Bolton, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Greene | Court of Appeals | |
Roulette v. Roulette
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9607-CH-00173
|
Weakley | Court of Appeals | |
Brian David McCray, v. Irene Carol Klanseck McCray
The husband sued for absolute divorce, claiming cruel and inhuman treatment and irreconcilable differences. The wife denied that her husband was entitled to a divorce, and she counterclaimed for a divorce from bed and board. After a hearing, the trial court dismissed the husband’s complaint and awarded the wife a divorce from bed and board and custody of the four minor children. The husband was ordered to pay alimony in futuro, child support and attorney fees. |
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Allen D. Curtis and wife, Carolyn June Curtis, v. William M. Rice, and Rice & Papuchis Construction Company, Inc.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs/appellants, Allen D. Curtis and his wife, Carolyn June Curtis, from a decision of the chancery court which dissolved the partnership formed between Curtis and |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Robert E. Evans, v. Amcash Mortgage Company, Inc.
In this defamation action, Robert Evans (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Amcash Mortgage Company, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Franklin American Life Insurance Company1 for an alleged defamatory statement made by Defendant’s attorney to one of Defendant’s employees. In granting the Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, the trial court dismissed Franklin American Corporation from the suit, dismissed Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant under a theory of “slander by action,” and held that a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the statement made by Defendant’s attorney to one of Defendant’s employees regarding the reason for Plaintiff’s employment termination is subject to a qualified privilege. Defendant appeals the judgment of the court below arguing that the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion for summary judgment regarding the statement made by Defendant’s attorney to one of Defendant’s employees concerningthe reason for Plaintiff’s employment termination because the statement is subject to a qualified privilege and is not defamatory in nature. For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and hold that the statement made by Defendant’s attorney to one of Defendant’s employees regarding the reason for Plaintiff’s employment termination is subject to a qualified privilege and is not defamatory. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Ray Darris Thompson v. Stanley Dickerson, et al.
Plaintiff, Ray Darris Thompson, appeals the order of the trial court dismissing his |
Shelby | Court of Appeals |