COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

Creative vs. Bale
03A01-9611-CH-00379

Campbell Court of Appeals

State DHS vs. Rogoish
03A01-9704-CV-00145

Knox Court of Appeals

Ravenwood vs. Franklin
03A01-9705-CV-00156

Knox Court of Appeals

James Jones, et al vs. Randall Harris, et al
02A01-9701-CH-00010
Trial Court Judge: John Walton West

Lauderdale Court of Appeals

Steve/Lori Eldridge vs. City of Trenton, TN
02A01-9503-CV-00041
Trial Court Judge: Dick Jerman, Jr.

Gibson Court of Appeals

W2001-01724-COA-R3-JV
W2001-01724-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Christy R. Little

Madison Court of Appeals

Bruce Hutton, et al vs. City of Savannah, TN
02A01-9612-CV-00314
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

Hardin Court of Appeals

Decatur Co. Bank vs. Welborn Duck, et al
02A01-9603-CH-00057
Trial Court Judge: John Walton West

Decatur Court of Appeals

Adams TV of Memphis vs. Comcorp of TN, et al
02A01-9606-CH-00142
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos

Shelby Court of Appeals

Joseph Leibovich, et al vs. The Kroger Co., et al
02A01-9608-CV-00192
Trial Court Judge: D'Army Bailey

Shelby Court of Appeals

Carol Strong vs. Timothy Strong
02A01-9701-CV-00005
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown

Shelby Court of Appeals

Steve & Tammy Carroll vs. J.R. Roach
02A01-9703-CV-00056

McNairy Court of Appeals

01A01-9702-
01A01-9702-
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Kireyczyk, et. al. vs. MF Athletic Club
01A01-9612-CV-00549

Court of Appeals

Tate vs. TN. Bd. of Paroles & Myers
01A01-9703-CV-00156
Trial Court Judge: Ben H. Cantrell

Davidson Court of Appeals

Young vs. Young
01A01-9610-CH-00473
Trial Court Judge: Don R. Ash

Rutherford Court of Appeals

William Key vs. Julian Bolton, et al
02A01-9703-CR-00072
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft

Shelby Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Greene Court of Appeals

Roulette v. Roulette
03A01-9701-GS-00010

Court of Appeals

02A01-9607-CH-00173
02A01-9607-CH-00173
Trial Court Judge: William Michael Maloan

Weakley Court of Appeals

Brian David McCray, v. Irene Carol Klanseck McCray
01A01-9612-CH-00553
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jim T. Hamilton

The husband sued for absolute divorce, claiming cruel and inhuman treatment and irreconcilable differences. The wife denied that her husband was entitled to a divorce, and she counterclaimed for a divorce from bed and board. After a hearing, the trial court dismissed the husband’s complaint and awarded the wife a divorce from bed and board and custody of the four minor children. The husband was ordered to pay alimony in futuro, child support and attorney fees.

Maury Court of Appeals

Allen D. Curtis and wife, Carolyn June Curtis, v. William M. Rice, and Rice & Papuchis Construction Company, Inc.
01A01-9605-CH-00211
Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Tom E. Gray

This is an appeal by plaintiffs/appellants, Allen D. Curtis and his wife, Carolyn June Curtis, from a decision of the chancery court which dissolved the partnership formed between Curtis and
defendant/appellee, William M. Rice, and which distributed the partnership's assets.1 The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows.

Sumner Court of Appeals

Robert E. Evans, v. Amcash Mortgage Company, Inc.
01A01-9608-CV-00386
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Judge Thomas W. Brothers

In this defamation action, Robert Evans (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Amcash Mortgage Company, Inc. (“Defendant”) and Franklin American Life Insurance Company1 for an alleged defamatory statement made by Defendant’s attorney to one of Defendant’s employees. In granting the Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, the trial court dismissed Franklin American Corporation from the suit, dismissed Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant under a theory of “slander by action,” and held that a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the statement made by Defendant’s attorney to one of Defendant’s employees regarding the reason for Plaintiff’s employment termination is subject to a qualified privilege. Defendant appeals the judgment of the court below arguing that the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion for summary judgment regarding the statement made by Defendant’s attorney to one of Defendant’s employees concerningthe reason for Plaintiff’s employment termination because the statement is subject to a qualified privilege and is not defamatory in nature. For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and hold that the statement made by Defendant’s attorney to one of Defendant’s employees regarding the reason for Plaintiff’s employment termination is subject to a qualified privilege and is not defamatory.

Court of Appeals

Ray Darris Thompson v. Stanley Dickerson, et al.
02A01-9702-CV-00034
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Judge Karen R. Williams

Plaintiff, Ray Darris Thompson, appeals the order of the trial court dismissing his
complaint against the defendants, Stanley Dickerson, Betty Hammond, Vernon Brown, June Wesson, Bruce MacDonald, and Christine Bradley, for failure to prosecute.

Shelby Court of Appeals