Monica R. Williams, v. Claude Williams
Claude D. Williams (Husband) appeals from the trial court’s award of rehabilitative alimony to be paid to Monica R. Williams (Wife) at $500 per month for eighteen months. This was a marriage of approximately five years duration. Wife was a junior in college attending school full-time and working two part-time jobs. She testified that her net income was $880 and her expenses $1,507 per month. Husband has an engineering degree and earns approximately $38,000 annually. No children were born to the marriage. Wife was granted the divorce on the grounds of inappropriate marital conduct. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Dept. of Children's Services vs. D.S.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Huttchson vs. Cole
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9606-CV-00251
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9606-CV-00251
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9607-CH-00336
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9601-CV-00036
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9607-CV-00316
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9608-CH-00371
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Marilyn L. Green v. Carlos Eugene Green
In this divorce action, the trial court awarded Marilyn Green (the “Wife”) a divorce from Carlos Green (the “Husband”) upon the grounds of inappropriate marital conduct. Pursuant to a property settlement agreement, the parties agreed to sell the marital home by auction, pay the remaining indebtedness on the home and divide the proceeds equally. The parties agreed that the Wife would receive a Mercury automobile, a Ford Thunderbird automobile, the furniture, household furnishings and real estate located in the Eaton community. The parties agreed that the Husband would receive the farming equipment, guns, saddles and two pickup trucks. The trial court divided the remainder of the parties’ property and awarded the wife a one-half interest in the Husband’s retirement income and awarded the Husband a one-half interest in the Wife’s retirement income. The court further awarded each party a one-fourth interest in a fifty-seven acre tract of land in the Eaton community and awarded each party a one-sixth interest in twenty acres of corn planted as of the date of the final divorce hearing. The court further ordered that the livestock owned by the parties be sold and the proceeds divided equally. The Husband has appealed the judgment of the trial court arguing that the trial court’s division of property was improper. For the reasons stated hereafter, we reverse the judgment of the trial court as to the Wife’s interest in a fifty-seven acre tract of land in the Eaton community and affirm as to the Wife’s interest in twenty acres of planted corn. |
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
Keryn Hickerson v. Jerry Finchum - Concurring
This appeal concerns whether the appellant, Jerry Finchum (“Finchum” or “Father”), should be legally required to pay retroactive child support for his child, Elizabeth Jane Hickerson, born February 16, 1983 to the appellee, Karen Hickerson (“Hickerson” or “Mother”). The juvenile court awarded such support, in the amount of $31,080, and Finchum has appealed. For reasons set forth below, we affirm. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9607-CV-00317
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9601-GS-00021
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9607-CV-00328
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9607-CV-00337
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Elvin L. Blankenship and wife, Mary Blankenship, and Wayne Blankenship, v. Alvis Blankenship and wife, Dorothy Blankenship, and Charles Goodman and wife, Kathy Goodman
In this boundary line dispute the Trial Court appointed a surveyor who established a boundary line between the parties which ws adopted by the Trial Judge in the Decree in this case. Defendants has appealed, asserting the Trial Court erred in limiting their proof and in adopting the boundary established by the surveyor. |
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee, v. John Guinn
This is a juvenile delinquency proceeding. Defendant, John Guinn, appeals from the order of the Circuit Court of Shelby County on a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of committing the delinquent act of attempt to commit murder in the second degree. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9606-CH-00256
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01A01-9606-CH-00256
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01A01-9606-CH-00278
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9606-CH-00279
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Seffernick vs. St. Thomas Hospital
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Carl E. Jordan, v. Tennessee Board of Paroles, et al.
An inmate in the custody of the Department of Correction filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to challenge the Parole Board’s refusal to grant him parole. The Chancery Court dismissed the Petition for failure to comply with the time limitations for filing. We affirm the dismissal on the alternate ground of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9603-CH-00098
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01A01-9605-CH-00222
|
Fentress | Court of Appeals |