01A01-9604-PB-00163
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9605-CV-00230
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9606-CH-00256
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9606-CH-00256
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Seffernick vs. St. Thomas Hospital
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Seffernick vs. St. Thomas Hospital
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9607-CV-00304
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Ray v. Stanton, App. No. 88-285-Ii, 1989 Wl 14135 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24,
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01A01-9609-CH-00426
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
John Timothy Enochs, v. Dr. George Nerren, Superintendent of Dyersburg Schools, and The Dyersburg Board of Education
This case involves the dismissal of a tenured teacher. Appellant John Timothy Enochs (“Enochs”) challenges his discharge by Appellee Dyersburg Board of Education (“Board”) from his position as a tenured teacher in the Dyersburg City School System. After a hearing, Enochs’ dismissal was affirmed by the trial court. In this appeal, Enochs claims that the trial court’s hearing and review of the Board’s dismissal violated the Teacher Tenure Act and his right to due process. We affirm the decision of the trial court. |
Dyer | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Loudon | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Loudon | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Jerrell McVay and Cynthia Marie McVay, State of Tennessee Intervenor, v. Sharon Blen, Custodial Parent of Lauren Nicole McVay, a minor
This case arises under the Grandparents’ Visitation Act. The Petitioners/Appellees, Jerrell |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Kenneth Dale Nance, v. Tina Louise Nance
Custody of the five-year old son of these parties was awarded to his mother, the propriety of which the appellant-father questions. Our review of the findings of the trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the finding, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. TENN. CODE ANN. § 50-6-225(3)(2). Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 584 (Tenn. 1991). We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge, and we are not positioned to evaluate the credibility of the parties or their witnesses. Walls v. Magnolia Truck Lines, 622 S.W.2d 526 (Tenn. 1981). |
Henry | Court of Appeals | |
David Vaughn vs. Daimler Chrysler
|
Carter | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9511-CH-00395
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9605-CH-00165
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9605-CH-00219
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals |