Honorable Hamilton v. Gayden, Jr., Judge
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9603-PB-00093
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9604-CH-00149
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01A01-9604-CH-00191
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9508-CV-00175
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9604-CH-00091
|
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9511-CH-00412
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9511-CV-00410
|
Court of Appeals | ||
The Honorable Frank v. Williams, Iii
|
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9511-CV-00262
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9504-CV-00073
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9409-CH-00213
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9601-CH-00046
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9604-CV-00145
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9510-DR-00464
|
Robertson | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9603-CV-00078
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9604-CV-00119
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9605-CV-00163
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Wendy Setters individually and as the parent of minors Melanie Ann Setters and Nicole Krystal Setters, v. Permanent General Assurance Corporation
This is a declaratory judgment action. In the complaint, Wendy Setters (Mrs. Setters) seeks a declaration that an exclusion in her automobile insurance policy is invalid as against public policy; and, alternatively, that the exclusion, due to an ambiguity in the insurance policy, is unenforceable against her. The subject provision excludes the extension of liability coverage to an insured when that person's negligence causes injury to a family member. Relying on this exclusion, the defendant, Permanent General Assurance Corporation (Permanent General), denied coverage with respect to claims asserted by Mrs. Setters individually and on behalf of her children arising solely out of injuries sustained by the children in an automobile accident. The accident was caused, in part, by the negligent driving of her husband. The trial court granted Permanent General's motion for judgement on the pleadings, finding the exclusion to be valid, enforceable and not violative of the public policy" of Tennessee. Plaintiff appeals, raising two issues that present the following questions: 1. Is a provision in an automobile insurance policy excluding coverage for liability to a "family member" violative of the public policy of Tennessee? 2. Is the liability coverage in the subject policy ambiguous so as to warrant a strict constructino against Permanent General? |
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9509-CH-00202
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9510-CV-00231
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9505-CH-00102
|
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
Zella Balentine, v. Simon White, In Re: Paternity of Ashley Arron Balentine, a Minor
Zella Balentine (“plaintiff”) filed a petition in the Juvenile Court of Hardin County seeking to have that court declare Simon White (“defendant”) to be the natural father of the parties’ minor child, Ashley Balentine. The Hardin County General Sessions Court, in its role as Juvenile Court, found defendant to be the father of the child and awarded plaintiff retroactive child support dating back to November 1, 1992. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion by not awarding retroactive child support back to the date of the child’s birth. For the reasons stated, we find that the trial court did abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we reverse as to this issue and remand this cause to that court for further proceedings. |
Hardin | Court of Appeals | |
Howard A. Woods, v. Mutual of Omaha and CNA Insurance Company, and Eastwood Hospital
Woods filed suit against various defendants; however, the judgment before us enters summary judgment in favor of Omaha only and was rendered final by the trial court in accordance with Rule 54.02 T.R.C.P. Thus, Omaha is the only Appellee for purposes of this appeal. This case concerns the validity of a “Compromise Settlement Release” executed by the appellant, Howard A. Woods (Woods), in favor of the appellee, Mutual of Omaha (Omaha). Woods challenges its validity on the ground of mental incapacity. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Omaha Woods has appealed. For reasons hereinafter expressed, we affirm. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Grace Thru Faith, v. Tony L. Caldwell, and Tony L. Caldwell and Joann P. Caldwell Trust, v. Edward Irwin and Rebecca Irwin
This is a case involving a trustee’s improper accounting procedures and misuse of funds regarding a trust set up to receive Social Security Insurance payments. At issue is whether Tennessee state courts have subject matter jurisdiction to hear a dispute between a beneficiary and his representative payee over alleged misuse of Social Security benefits. The trial court found it had jurisdiction. We affirm. |
Weakley | Court of Appeals |