David Hutton, v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee - Dissenting
The majority has decided that Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-510 (1994) permits the purchaser of a used jet aircraft to reduce his state tax liability by deducting the value of a previously owned prop-driven aircraft from the purchase price of the jet aircraft. I do not agree that Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-510 applies to the purchase of the jet because the transaction does not involve a trade or series of trades. |
Giles | Court of Appeals | |
Gary Bernard Sanders, v. Don Sundquist, Governor of State of Tennessee, et al.
The captioned plaintiff, an inmate of the Department of Correction, filed this suit against the Governor, Commissioner of Correction and Commissioner of Correction, seeking a declaration of his rights to release from incarceration. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss supported by affidavit of an official of the Department of Correction. The motion was therefore a motion for summary judgment. T.R.C.P. Rule 12.02. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Thomas Tarpley, v. Charles Traughber, Chairman, Tennessee Board of Paroles
The captioned plaintiff, an inmate of the Department of Corrections, filed this suit for certiorari from an adverse decision of the Board of Paroles. The Trial Court dismissed the suit for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Gate Pharmeceuticals, a Division of the Lemmon Company, v. Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners
This Board added this language in its amendment to the original version of the rule. This case involves a challenge to the validity of a rule promulgated by the Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners. Gate Pharmaceuticals appeals the judgment of the trial court upholding the rule’s validity. We affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ty Farming Company, Inc., v. George Belew and The County of Dyer, Tennessee
Plaintiff-Appellant, TY Farming Company, Inc. (“TY Farming”), appeals the judgment of the trial court denying TY Farming’s claims against Defendants-Appellees Dyer County (“Dyer County”) and George Belew (“Belew”) relative to a dirt road which crossed properties owned by TY Farming, Belew, and other landowners in Dyer County. The trial court found that the dirt road had been abandoned by the County and the general public, that the road was no longer a public road, and, therefore, that the County had no obligation to maintain the road. Accordingly, the judgment denied TY Farming’s claim for damages against the County and dismissed the County from the lawsuit. With regard to TY Farming’s claim against Belew, the judgment granted TY Farming an easement across the property of Belew. The trial court further found that Belew had deprived TY Farming of its previously existing easement of ingress and egress to its property, but the court found that TY Farming had suffered no damages because it had continuous access to its property by another route. Accordingly, the trial court denied TY Farming’s claim for damages against Belew and dismissed TY Farming’s complaint in its entirety. |
Dyer | Court of Appeals | |
David Via and wife, Patty Via, v. Jimmy Joe Welch, Herman Reed and Tommy Reed
This is a suit brought by Plaintiffs-Appellants, David Via and his wife Patty Via (“Via”), against Defendants-Appellees, Jimmy Joe Welch, Herman Reed and Tommy Reed (collectively |
Carroll | Court of Appeals | |
Barbara Beem, v. Robert Alan Beem
Defendant-Appellant, Robert Alan Beem (“Husband”), appeals the judgment of the trial court ordering him to pay child support, alimony, and attorney’s fees to Plaintiff-Appellee, Barbara Beem (“Wife”). |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Helen Bond Scofield, v. Stephen David Scofield
This case involves a petition for increase of child support. Petitioner, Stephen David Scofield (Father), appeals from the trial court’s order denying his petition to modify the parties’ final decree of divorce to increase child support payments by Respondent, Helen Bond Scofield 2 (Mother). |
Court of Appeals | ||
Tyrus C. Ragland and Bonnie S. Ragland, Husband and Wife, and Guy Treece and Marla Treece, Husband and Wife, v. Sidney Feuerstein and Betsy Feuerstein
This matter appears appropriate for consideration pursuant to Rule 10(b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee.1 Defendant-Appellants Sidney and Betsy Feuerstein (“Feuersteins”) appeal the Chancery Court’s order in favor of Plaintiff-Appellees Tyrus Ragland and other neighbors enjoining the Feuersteins from building a greenhouse on their property in violation of a restrictive covenant. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Richard P. Rienholtz, v. Christine Bradley, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction
Richard P. Rienholtz, an inmate in the Tennessee prison system petitioned the Chancery Court of Davidson County for a declaratory judgment arguing that the Department of Correction’s decision to extend his parole eligibility date for escape was illegal. The chancellor dismissed the petition and we affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Kevin Ryan Mosley v. Tennessee Board of Paroles, et al.
Kevin Mosley, a prisoner in the custody of the Department of Correction, was twice considered for parole. On each occasion the Parole Board declined to release him, citing as its reason the seriousness of his offense. Mr. Mosley filed a Petition for Certiorari with the Chancery Court of Davidson County, contending that he was entitled to a more definite statement of the Parole Board’s reasons. The prisoner also argued that the Board erred in failing to consider the results of a psychological study it had ordered. The Chancery Court dismissed the petition. We affirm the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Mary Alice Bolton Prince, v. St. Thomas Hospital, et al.
This is an appeal by plaintiff/appellant, Mary Alice Bolton Prince, from the decision of the trial court granting the motions for summary judgment of defendants/appellees. The trial court based its decision on its finding that Mrs. Prince was fiftypercent or more at fault. The facts out of which this controversy arose are as follows. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Susan Kay Pilger Riggs, v. James Landry Riggs
The plaintiff/wife has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court declaring the parties divorced pursuant to T.C.A. § 36-4-129, placing child custody in the wife and awarding child support. The issues on appeal relate only to support. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Martin Silva v. James A. Crossman, d/b/a Jim Crossman Realty - Concurring
This appeal involves a dispute as to the obligations of the parties under a lease agreement. The lessor of the premises, James A. Crossman, terminated the lease after discovering that the lessee, Martin Silva, had experienced problems with violence and other criminal activities at the previous location of his nightclub. Silva filed a complaint in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking damages for breach of the lease contract. The trial court heard the case without a jury and awarded damages to Silva. Crossman has appealed and argues that the trial court erred in failing to find grounds for rescission of the lease and in awarding damages to Silva. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
David F. Bush v. Brenda L. Allgood and Mercantile Properties, Inc.
The Trial Court granted summary judgement dismissing one of the defendants, Mercantile Properties, Inc., and ordered entry of final partial judgment pursuant to T.R.C.P. Rule 54.02. Plaintiff has appealed. The remaining defendant, Brenda L. Allgood, is not involved in this appeal. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9508-CV-00168
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9605-CV-00170
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9510-CV-00236
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9604-CH-00177
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9603-CV-00122
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9604-CV-00180
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals |