Bill Jennings v. Lawler-Wood, Inc.
03A01-9803-CV-00111
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Richard E. Ladd

The controversy giving rise to this appeal had its genesis in a service contract for washers and dryers entered into between Plaintiff Bill Jennings and Defendant Lawler-Wood, Inc., which manageg Maple Oak apartments for the owners. 

Janet G. Seals v. Jefferson City, Tennessee and Jefferson County, Tennessee
03A01-9808-CV-00269
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Rex Henry Ogle

The issue presented by this appeal is whether an amendment to T.C. A.50 -1-304, (commonly knownn as the Whistle Blower Statute), which brough employees of the State of Tennessee within its purview, should be given retrospective effect.

City of Lafayette v. Mark and Ruby Hammock
01A01-9901-CV-00056
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bobby H. Capers

In its eminent domain proceeding, the City of Lafayette (City) took a small strip of Mark and Ruby Hammock’s land along the City’s right-of-way for an existing street.

Pearl Nixon, v. Shoney's, Inc.
01A01-9711-CV-00629
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bobby H. Capers

This is a personal injury slip and fall case. The plaintiff was injured when she fell in the defendant’s restaurant due to a tray negligently left on the floor. The defendant restaurant admits liability but asserts that the evidence does not support the amount of the trial court’s award and seeks a remittitur. We affirm the trial court’s decision as modified.

Mitchell L. Darnall, v. A+ Homecare, Inc., and James Bradley Smith, et al. - Concurring
01A01-9807-CV-00347
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.

The court has correctly affirmed the summary judgment dismissing Mr. Darnall’s Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-1-304 (Supp. 1998) claim. Even though I concur with the court’s decision, I have prepared this separate opinion to state my understanding of the elements of a Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-1-304 claim. I find this restatement necessary because of the Western Section’s reliance on Johnson v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 759 S.W.2d 925 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988) in Merryman v. Central Parking Sys., Inc., No. 01A01-9203-CH-00076, 1992 WL 330404 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 1992) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed).

Theresa G. Jenkins v. Lionel R. Barrett, Jr., and John G. Oliva - Concurring
01A01-9809-CV-00514
Authoring Judge: Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Judge Lee Russell

The appellant states the issue before this Court thus:

A single, narrow issue is presented for consideration in this appeal: Does material evidence within the meaning of Rule 13d, appear in the record which suports the jury’s verdict of $140 ,000.00 in compensatory damages, and, if so, did the trial court erroneously grant a new trial?

The case history demonstrates that this issue is not properly before the Court for consideration.

Greg Williams v. Suburban Manufacturing
03S01-9806-CH-00062
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Jeffrey F. Stewart,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employee or claimant, Williams, insists the evidence preponderates against the trial court's denial of medical benefits and temporary total disability benefits. The employer, Suburban, insists the evidence preponderance against the trial court's finding that the employee suffered an injury by accident and that the claim should be disallowed because the employee failed to give notice of his claim as required by Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-21. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. The employee initiated this civil action seeking workers' compensation benefits for an injury which occurred when he slipped and fell on ice on his way to work at the employer's plant. The defendant, in its responsive pleading, admitted the employee gave "notification of an occurrence," but denied that the employee "gave proper notice" of an injury. After a trial on the merits, the trial court awarded permanent partial disability benefits, but denied any recovery for temporary total disability benefits and medical expenses for treatment not authorized by the employer. This panel has reviewed the case de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(2). On February 1, 1996, the claimant slipped on ice as he was entering the employer's plant to begin the day's work. He promptly informed his supervisor of the accident and said he did not know if he would be able to complete the shift or not. The employer did not make a written record of the occurrence or investigate it because the claimant did not request medical care. Four months later, the employer received written notice of the accident from the claimant's attorney. Without consulting the employer, the claimant sought treatment from a chiropractor, Jeffrey C. Hamilton. Dr. Hamilton opined that the February 1st accident caused a new injury superimposed on preexisting back problems, including degenerative disc disease. He referred the claimant to his family physician, who prescribed physical therapy. Dr. Richard B. Donaldson examined and evaluated the claimant. Dr. Donaldson diagnosed low back and knee sprains and chronic pain syndrome. 2

Deborah Lorraine Brooks v. Rickey Lemar Brooks
03S01-9804-CV-00034
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: Judge Earl G. Murphy

We granted this appeal to determine whether the Court of Appeals and the trial court erred in their determinations of the amount of child support to be paid by the child’s father. Although both the trial court and the Court of Appeals determined that the total monthly payment should be increased from four hundred dollars ($400.00) to six hundred fifty dollars ($650.00), each court reached its conclusion upon different reasons. We conclude that both courts erred and that the base amount of child support should have been $1,241.00 per month. In addition, Mr. Brooks shall pay the child's private education expenses per the parties agreement.
 

State of Tennessee vs. George Langford - Concurring
02S01-9806-CR-00061
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Trial Court Judge: Judge Arthur T. Bennett

We granted this appeal to decide whether: (1) the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of aggravated burglary and felony murder committed during the perpetration of an aggravated burglary; and (2) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury as to criminal trespass. We hold that the evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant and that the trial court did not err in failing to instruct the jury on criminal trespass.  Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the defendant’s convictions is affirmed.

State of Tennessee v. Ray L. Taylor - Concurring
02S01-9809-CR-00089
Authoring Judge: Justice Janice M. Holder
Trial Court Judge: Judge James C. Beasley, Jr.

We granted this appeal to decide whether a defendant’s credibility may be impeached by reference to a prior conviction for a “felony involving dishonesty.” We hold that the trial court erred in ruling that the State could impeach the defendant by asking him whether he had been convicted of any “felonies involving dishonesty.” We hold, however, that the error was harmless.¹

State of Tennessee vs. Barry Waddell
01C01-9801-CR-00016
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge Cheryl Blackburn

The Defendant, Barry Waddell, appeals as of right from his conviction in the Davidson County Crimina l Court. After a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of two (2) counts of rape of a child (Counts 1 and 2) and two (2) counts of aggravated sexual battery (Counts 3 and 4). Defendant was sentenced to twenty-five (25) years for each count of rape of a child and ten (10) years for each count of aggravated sexual battery, with all sentences to be served consecutively, for an effective sentence of seventy (70) years. Defendant argues that the trial court improperly sentenced him to the maximum period of incarceration for his rape of a child convictions and erred in ordering his sentences to be served consecutively. We affirm in pa rt, and reverse and modify in part.

State of Tennessee vs. Paul Carr Moss, Jr.
01C01-9803-CC-00118
Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R. Wade
Trial Court Judge: Judge John H. Gasaway, III

The defendant, Paul Carr Moss, Jr., was indicted for the first degree murder of his wife, Peggy Ann Moss. He was convicted of second degree murder, a Class A felony. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-210. The trial court imposed a Range I sentence of twenty-five years. The defendant was fined $50,000.00.

Advanced Sales vs. Wilson Co.
01A01-9805-CH-00245
Trial Court Judge: C. K. Smith

Little Six Corporation vs. Ruth Johnson, Commissioner
01A01-9806-CH-00285
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Buford vs. Cunningham
01A01-9806-CH-00325
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

State vs. Lowell Clayton Gredig, Jr.
03C01-9801-CC-00017
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

02A01-9712-GS-00298
02A01-9712-GS-00298
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

Planet Rock vs. Regis Ins.
02A01-9807-CV-00218
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

James Alford v. Bruce Hardwood Floors
02S01-9808-CH-00083
Authoring Judge: J. Steven Stafford, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Joe C. Morris,

Catherine Mayo v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
02S01-9807-CH-00076
Authoring Judge: L. Terry Lafferty, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Joe C. Morris, Chancellor
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. On or about August 24, 1993, the plaintiff, Catherine Mayo, was engaged in her regular employment duties as manager for Pizza Hut, when she suffered total permanent disabling injuries. An armed robber inflicted a massive shotgun blast to the plaintiff's entire abdomen. On August 11, 1997, the plaintiff filed a Petition for Approval of Final and Lump Sum Settlement under the Workers' Compensation Law. The trial court entered an order approving the final and cash lump sum settlement, awarding total permanent disability benefits at the maximum rate of recovery through age 65 pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-27, and lifetime future medical expenses. However, judgment was reserved for a later determination by the trial court on the issue of the medical provision of a heated hydrotherapy pool to be installed at the plaintiff's residence. Prior to May 11, 1998, the plaintiff submitted to the trial court medical reports of two physicians in support of her request for an in-home hydrotherapy pool. On May 11, 1998, the trial court considered the merits of plaintiff's motion. On June 29, 1998, the trial court entered an order denying the request for the medical apparatus, more specifically described as the in-ground heated hydrotherapy pool. Since the plaintiff is making a most unusual request that the defendant install an in- ground hydrotherapy pool at her residence as a medical apparatus that is medically necessary, it is beneficial to set forth the underlying facts of this request. At the time of this unfortunate event, the plaintiff, age 47, was a resident of Jackson, Tennessee, but now resides in Buffalo, New York, where she has family support. The shotgun blast injured the plaintiff's chest, solar plexus, abdomen, abdominal wall, and side. Dr. Joseph Spychalski, the treating physician, found that the plaintiff sustained a complete obliteration of the anterior abdominal musculature, and that, as a consequence, she lacks the ability to efficiently sit, transfer, ambulate, bend, or lift. The plaintiff will require lifelong physical therapy to maintain her back muscles and range of motion. Due to the shotgun blast, the 2

Mark S. Miller vs. State
03C01-9803-CR-00108

Jenny C. Walker vs. James M. Walker
M2001-00087-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano
After the parties separated, the husband borrowed a substantial amount of money to complete the renovation of marital property and to pay household expenses. The trial court divided the marital property pursuant to divorce, classifying the husband's post-separation loans as marital debt. The wife argues on appeal that the trial court erred in its classification and division of the post-separation debts. We affirm the trial court.

State vs. Stanley Abell
02C01-9805-CR-00129
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

State vs. Stanley Abell
02C01-9805-CR-00129
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

State vs. Charles Bledsoe
02C01-9809-CC-00269