01A01-9509-CH-00419
01A01-9509-CH-00419
Trial Court Judge: Donald P. Harris

03C01-9509-CC-00258
03C01-9509-CC-00258

03C01-9505-CR-00138
03C01-9505-CR-00138

02C01-9505-CC-00149
02C01-9505-CC-00149

The Victim'S Age. W E Relied on State v. Adams, 864 S.W .2D 31 (Tenn. 1993).
02C01-9506-CC-00178

02C01-9310-CC-00233
02C01-9310-CC-00233
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

02C01-9504-CR-00111
02C01-9504-CR-00111
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

02C01-9506-CC-00163
02C01-9506-CC-00163
Trial Court Judge: Dick Jerman, Jr.

02C01-9507-CR-00187
02C01-9507-CR-00187
Trial Court Judge: John P. Colton, Jr.

03C01-9502-CR-00055
03C01-9502-CR-00055
Trial Court Judge: J. Kenneth Porter

03C01-9504-CR-00119
03C01-9504-CR-00119
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Harold v. Smith,
03C01-9506-CR-00168
Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner

03A01-9509-CV-00306
03A01-9509-CV-00306
Trial Court Judge: Thomas J. Seeley, Jr.

02A01-9310-CH-00219
02A01-9310-CH-00219
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos

01S01-9303-CC-00052
01S01-9303-CC-00052

03S01-9502-CH-00017
03S01-9502-CH-00017

03C01-9503-CR-00070
03C01-9503-CR-00070
Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen

03C01-9505-CR-00134
03C01-9505-CR-00134

02A01-9411-CV-00258
02A01-9411-CV-00258
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

01S01-9303-CC-00052
01S01-9303-CC-00052

Canonie Energy, Inc. and WGI, Inc. v. Rodney King, Mark Holbrook, American Resources Management, Inc., American Gas Technologies, Inc., American Energy Exploration, Inc., Berrod, Inc. Rick Castor and McCrome LTD., Inc.
03A01-9506-CH-00200
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor WilliamE.

The Defendants appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of the Plaintiffs for the enforcement of a settle ment agreement.

Demetreous Flengas, v. Kimberly Denise Flengas
03A01-9508-CV-00281
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Judge William M. Barker

Demetreous Flengas, the husband, and Kimberly Denise Flengas, the wife, were granted an absolute divorce in September 1994 in Hamilton County. Shortly thereafter, the Trial Court entered its memorandum opinion and order which directed the division of the parties' assets and liabilities. It is from this order that the husband appeals.

Phyllis Hovenden, Bill Hovenden, Ellen Wemyss, Patricia Highers, Richard Rouch, and Citizens for and Orderly Development of Gallatin, v. City of Gallatin, Galatin Planning Commission, et al.
01A01-9508-CH-00383
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Gilcrease, Jr.

The captioned petitioners filed their “Petition for Writ of Certiorari and Verified Complaint” seeking review of the action of the City Council of Gallatin in regard to the zoning of certain property and for injunctive relief. From an adverse judgment in the Trial Court, one of the petitioners, Phyllis Hovenden, has appealed, presenting the following issues for review:

Angie Brooks, v. Kimberly J. Quam Davis and Gayle Schaal - Concurring
01A01-9509-CV-00402
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.s

Two persons injured in a one-car accident sued the driver of the car in which they were riding. After obtaining an essentially worthless judgment against the unknown driver of another car, the passengers perfected this appeal to take issue with the trial court’s decision to permit their driver to rely on a “phantom automobile” defense even though she had not included this defense in her answer. The majority has determined that the trial court properly permitted the driver to assert this defense and to amend her pleadings to conform to the proof. While I concur with the majority’s decision under the circumstances of this case, I have prepared this separate opinion to avoid leaving a mistaken impression that the driver’s answer complied with Tenn. R. Civ. P. 8.03. It did not; however, the error does not undermine the jury’s verdict in this case.

Jack Lloyd Beaty, Sr., v. Mary Joyce Scott Beaty
01A01-9507-CH-00325
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Williams
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Henry Denmark Bell

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the Wife/Appellant is entitled to post judgment interest on a judgment of $50,000 awarded her by the decree of divorce entered December 28, 1992.