Please enter some keywords to search.
| State vs. Chris A. Jefferson
E2000-00429-CCA-R3-CD
Chris A. Jefferson appeals a certified question of law regarding a police officer's stop of him which resulted in his arrest for driving under the influence. Because we agree with the trial court that reasonable suspicion supported by specific and articulable facts existed for the stop, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Phyllis H. Miller |
Sullivan County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. James Douglas Hampton
E1999-00115-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from the trial court's revocation of his probation. The defendant admits that he materially violated his probation, but contends that the trial court's disposition of the case was improper. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Treva Dianne Green
E1999-02204-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals from her Blount County Circuit Court conviction and sentence for driving under the influence, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced the defendant to eleven months and 29 days in the Blount County Jail, all of which was suspended except for service of eight days incarceration. The jury imposed a fine of $1,500. In this direct appeal, the defendant complains that the evidence is insufficient to support her conviction, that statements she made to the arresting officer should have been suppressed, that prosecutorial misconduct taints the verdict, that the jury should have been charged on reckless driving as a lesser-included offense, and that her sentence and fine are excessive. We affirm the judgment of the trial court, as modified.
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Clara Frazier,vs. East Tennessee Baptist Hosp., Inc. et al.
E2000-00686-COA-R3-CV
In this medical malpractice case brought by Clara Frazier, as Administratrix of the Estate of Josie Mae Blalock Pickens against East Tennessee Baptist Hospital, Inc., and Mark W. Jackson, M.D., the Trial Court sustained the motion of Baptist Hospital for summary judgment because the order granting an amendment to add Baptist Hospital as a party defendant after a non-suit had earlier been taken, was not timely and exceeded the one year mandated in T.C.A. 28-1-105(a). Ms. Frazier appeals, insisting that Rule 15.03 of the Tenn. R. Civ. P. is applicable and that the amendment related back to the date of the initial filing. We find the Trial Court acted properly and affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Dale C. Workman |
Knox County | Court of Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Robbie Carriger
E2000-00823-CCA-R3-CD
The state challenges the trial court's order placing the defendant, Robbie Carriger, on pretrial diversion based upon its finding that the prosecutor abused his discretion for failing to consider all the factors relevant to pretrial diversion in his written response denying diversion. The state contends that the trial court erred in refusing to consider the prosecutor's amended response to the application for pretrial diversion. We hold that the trial court properly refused to consider the prosecutor's amended response, but we reverse the trial court's automatic grant of pretrial diversion and remand the case for the trial court to consider the defendant's entitlement to pretrial diversion in light of the relevant factors.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Robert E. Cupp |
Carter County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State s. Anthony Lynn Wyrick
E1999-02206-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was convicted of two counts of aggravated rape and sentenced to concurrent terms of life without parole as a repeat violent offender. He challenges the sufficiency of the presentment, the sufficiency of the evidence, the admission of the victim's in-court identification of him as the attacker, the exclusion of evidence of a prior false accusation of rape by the victim, his inability to discover the victim's rape crisis center file, and the constitutionality of the repeat violent offender statute under which he was sentenced. Because the defendant should have been allowed to impeach the victim by cross-examining her about the prior false accusation of rape, we reverse the judgments of conviction and remand the case for a new trial.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge:Ray L. Jenkins |
Knox County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Nathaniel Lynn Crockett
E1999-00694-CCA-R3-CD
The Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of burglary and two counts of theft over $1,000. The trial court sentenced the Defendant to two years for each count of theft over $1,000 and to one year for each count of burglary. The trial court ordered that all sentences be served concurrently and that the Defendant serve six months in the county jail followed by intensive probation for the remainder of the sentence. The Defendant was ordered to pay $2,500 in restitution and to perform one hundred hours of community service. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred in sentencing him to six months in confinement. Finding no error, we affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Steamfitters vs. Phillip Morris
W1999-01061-COA-R9-CV
Union health and welfare funds brought an action against tobacco companies and their trade associations to recover the funds' costs of treating their participants' smoking-related illnesses. The tobacco companies moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the funds' economic injuries were derivative of the participants' physical injuries and, consequently, too remote for recovery. The trial court granted the motion to dismiss on the funds' antitrust claim but denied the motion on the funds' claims for fraud and deceit, misrepresentation, conspiracy and violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Permission for interlocutory appeal was granted to the tobacco companies by both the trial court and the appellate court. We affirm the trial court's dismissal of the antitrust claim and reverse the trial court's denial of the motion to dismiss on the remaining claims, finding the plaintiffs' alleged injuries are too remote, as a matter of law, to permit recovery. The cause is remanded for entry of an order dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint.
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Originating Judge:James F. Russell |
Shelby County | Court of Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| Rongie Taylor vs. State
M2002-01780-CCA-R3-PC
The post-conviction court denied the appellant's petition for post-conviction relief following his guilty plea to robbery with an agreed five-year sentence. In this appeal, the appellant argues: (1) his guilty plea was not entered voluntarily and knowingly; and (2) his trial counsel failed to provide him effective assistance relating to the entry of his plea. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Originating Judge:James L. Weatherford |
Warren County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| State vs. Wendell Lewis
W2001-03098-CCA-R3-CD
When the defendant's status on community corrections was revoked, the trial court should have given the defendant credit for the time served in the community corrections program. We, therefore, reverse and modify the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge:James C. Beasley, Jr. |
Shelby County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/26/00 | |
| X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Supreme Court | 09/25/00 | ||
| State vs. Shirley Cooper
E1999-01810-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant was charged with violation of probation for harassment. The trial court found that the defendant had materially and repeatedly violated the terms of her probation, and that, given her history, she was not capable of successfully completing a term of supervised probation. Consequently, the trial court revoked the defendant's probation, ordering that she serve her original sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days in jail, with credit given for the forty-one days of jail time she had already served. The defendant filed a timely appeal, presenting the sole issue of whether the trial court erred in revoking her probation. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Originating Judge:D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. |
Blount County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| R & D Marina, Inc., et al vs. Roane County, et al
E1999-02687-COA-R3-CV
Plaintiffs, a marina and its owners, were holders of a 1996 lease from Roane County to build and manage a marina. Plaintiffs received a permit from TVA to operate the marina in 1997. Plaintiffs filed suit against Roane County and four boathouse owners, seeking a declaratory judgment that the marina was entitled to monthly rent from the individual Defendants from the date of the Roane County lease until their boathouses were removed from the leased premises. The boathouse owners were holders of prior TVA permits to moor boathouses within the same area which became the marina pursuant to the 1996 lease and 1997 permit. The Trial Court ordered the boathouse owners to pay rent to the marina and to remove their boathouses. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court insofar as it ordered the individual Defendants to remove their boathouses. We hold the Trial Court erred in ordering the individual Defendants to pay rent starting from the date of the lease rather than the date of Plaintiffs' TVA permit. Accordingly, we modify the judgment of the Trial Court to reflect that Defendants owe rent to Plaintiffs from the date of Plaintiffs' TVA permit until the boathouses were removed. The judgment of the Trial Court is affirmed, as modified, and the case is remanded.
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Originating Judge:Frank V. Williams, III |
Roane County | Court of Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| Writesman vs. Writesman
M1999-00726-COA-R3-CV
This appeal is from the trial court's order denying Husband's Petition for Modification and sentencing him to thirty days in jail for criminal contempt. Husband attempted to show that there had been a substantial and material change in the relative financial positions of the parties and that his court ordered alimony obligation should be terminated or modified. Wife counter-petitioned for contempt of court, and Husband was, thereafter, charged with criminal contempt and found guilty for his failure to pay alimony. We agree with the trial court that Husband failed to show a material change in circumstances sufficient to justify terminating or modifying his alimony obligation. We also agree with the trial court's finding of criminal contempt and uphold its sentence of thirty days in prison for such contempt. Therefore, the ruling of the trial court on all issues presented on appeal is affirmed.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| Chambers vs. Amonette
M1999-01254-COA-R3-CV
At the time of the parties' divorce in 1992, their minor child was placed in the primary residential custody of the mother, and the father was ordered to pay child support in the amount of $300.00 per month. The mother instituted a petition to modify. The father is in the military and, at the time of trial, had a base pay of $2,888.46 per month, which included allowances for BAS, BAH, and BAQ-DIFF. The parties anticipated at the time of trial that the father would be transferred to Korea for one year of service, and then would be transferred to England. According to the father, he would continue to receive his BAQ-DIFF allowance, but, while in Korea, he would no longer receive BAS or BAH allowances. The mother sought an increase in the monthly support payments based upon a significant variation with the Tennessee Child Support Guidelines and based upon reduced visitation by the father. According to the parties' final divorce decree, the father's visitation schedule provided for an average of sixty-nine days of visitation throughout the year, as compared to the anticipated eighty days in the Guidelines. After a hearing on the matter, the trial court denied the petition and ordered the mother to pay the father's costs and attorney's fees. We reverse and remand.
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| State vs. Michael Anthony Maddox
M2000-00193-CCA-R3-CD
The defendant appeals the sentencing decision of the Marshall County Circuit Court. The defendant was convicted of two counts of sexual battery by an authority figure and sentenced to concurrent four year terms on each count. He was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual battery and sentenced to concurrent twelve year terms on each count. Those sentences were run consecutively to the sentences for aggravated battery, for an effective sentence of sixteen (16) years. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Authoring Judge: Judge Cornelia A. Clark
Originating Judge:William Charles Lee |
Marshall County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| Taylor vs. Heldman
M1999-00729-COA-R3-CV
Daniel Benson Taylor ("Plaintiff"), a prison inmate, filed suit for damages and other relief against two judges of the 21st Judicial District and, by amended complaint, the assistant attorneys general representing the two judges because of the alleged failure of the judges to grant his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial judge granted a Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 12.02(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The specially appointed trial judge sustained the motion and Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Originating Judge:Daniel Benson Taylor V Russell Heldman |
Hickman County | Court of Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| Thomas J. Williams vs. State
M2000-00506-CCA-R3-PC
Thomas J. Williams appeals from the Hickman County Circuit Court's denial of his pro se petition for post-conviction relief. After review, we find the trial court's summary dismissal proper because the petition (1) is time barred; (2) fails to state a colorable claim; and (3) raises claims which are waived as they were not raised in previous petitions. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's denial of the petition.
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Originating Judge:Timothy L. Easter |
Hickman County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| Prentice vs. Prentice
M1999-01507-COA-R3-CV
Ronald Prentice appeals from a decision of the Davidson County Circuit Court. The appeal involves a dispute over property division arising out of a divorce.
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Originating Judge:Muriel Robinson |
Davidson County | Court of Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| State of Tennessee v. Terry Eugene Ballard
II-1196-344-B
Originating Judge:Donald P. Harris |
Williamson County | Court of Criminal Appeals | 09/22/00 | |
| State vs. Hooper
M1997-00031-SC-R11-CD
The single issue in this appeal is whether the proof introduced at the sentencing hearing is sufficient to support a denial of probation based solely upon the need for deterrence. The Court of Criminal Appeals initially affirmed the sentence and held that proof of deterrence was not needed because drug use and possession cases are "deterrable per se." Upon the defendant's petition to rehear, however, the intermediate court reversed itself, holding that a "per se" rule of deterrence is inconsistent with the holding of this Court in State vs. Ashby, 823 S.W.2d 166 (Tenn. 1991). The State appealed to this Court. For the reasons given herein, we hold that the proof in this case is sufficient to justify denial of probation on the sole ground of deterrence. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals granting an alternative sentence is reversed, and the defendant's original term of incarceration is reinstated.
Authoring Judge: Justice William M. Barker
Originating Judge:Allen W. Wallace |
Humphreys County | Supreme Court | 09/21/00 | |
| Jerry Wayne Killion vs. Sandra Faye Sweat
E1999-02634-COA-R3-CV
In this post-divorce proceeding, the father of Dustin Lynn Killion filed a petition seeking the child's custody. The trial court denied the father's petition. The father appeals the trial court's determination that the proof fails to demonstrate a material change of circumstances warranting a change of custody. We reverse.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Robert M. Summitt |
Campbell County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Wilson Pharmacy, Inc., vs. General Computer Corp.
E2000-00733-COA-R3-CV
The origin of this appeal is a complaint filed by Plaintiff Wilson Pharmacy, Inc., against Defendant General Computer Corporation, seeking damages for allegedly furnishing defective computer hardware and software programs pursuant to contracts entered into between the parties. The Trial Court found that the provision providing suit must be brought within one year after accrual of the action barred Wilson Pharmacy's claim. Wilson Pharmacy appeals, contending the contract they entered into was one of adhesion, rendering the contract limitation period ineffective. We affirm.
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Originating Judge:Thomas J. Seeley, Jr. |
Washington County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Brenda D. Estes, et al vs. Sandra H. Peels, et al
E1999-00582-COA-R3-CV
This case arises out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred when a vehicle exited a manufacturing plant's parking lot and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle on a public highway. Brenda D. Estes and her husband sued the owner of the plant for negligence. The trial court granted the plant owner summary judgment. We hold that, under the circumstances of this case, the plant owner did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff and therefore affirm the grant of summary judgment.
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge:Ben W. Hooper, II |
Jefferson County | Court of Appeals | 09/21/00 | |
| Stephenson vs. Carlton
E1998-00202-SC-R11-CD
We granted this appeal to determine whether the appellant's sentence of life without parole for first- degree murder was an illegal sentence and, if so, whether the appellant was entitled to habeas corpus relief. The trial court dismissed the petition for habeas corpus and the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. We conclude, and the State concedes, that the sentence of life without parole was not a statutorily authorized punishment at the time the appellant committed the offense of first-degree murder and that the illegal sentence was properly challenged in a habeas corpus petition. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Originating Judge:Lynn W. Brown |
Johnson County | Supreme Court | 09/21/00 |