APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
Cook vs. Brookside

03A01-9706-CV-00212
Court of Appeals 10/31/97
Miller vs. State

03C01-9608-CC-00323

Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr.
Anderson County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/31/97
03C01-9612-CR-00453

03C01-9612-CR-00453
Johnson County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/31/97
State vs. Greene

03C01-9608-CC-00316
Blount County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/31/97
Courtner vs. State

03C01-9701-CR-00005
Johnson County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/31/97
State vs. Ball

03C01-9512-CC-00387

Originating Judge:Rex Henry Ogle
Cocke County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/31/97
03C01-9405-CR-00161

03C01-9405-CR-00161

Originating Judge:R. Steven Bebb
McMinn County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/31/97
State vs. Harris

03C01-9611-CR-00428
Anderson County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/31/97
Fortunes vs. Watson

03A01-9705-CV-00164

Originating Judge:James B. Scott, Jr.
Anderson County Court of Appeals 10/31/97
McBee/Dunlap vs. State

03C01-9509-CR-00276
Knox County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/31/97
John Tigrett vs. Union Planters Bank

02A01-9703-CV-00057

Originating Judge:Robert L. Childers
Shelby County Court of Appeals 10/31/97
Shofner vs. Red Food Stores (TN)

01A01-9609-CV-00437

Originating Judge:Lee Russell
Bedford County Court of Appeals 10/31/97
Volunteer Beer, Inc. vs. Johnson, Jr.

01A01-9703-CH-00126

Originating Judge:Robert S. Brandt
Davidson County Court of Appeals 10/31/97
Engenius Entertainment vs. W. W. Herenton, et al

02A01-9704-CH-00078

Originating Judge:D. J. Alissandratos
Shelby County Court of Appeals 10/31/97
Donald D'Amico vs. James Davenport, et al

02A01-9705-CH-00097

Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris
Court of Appeals 10/31/97
State Dept. of Children Svcs vs. Manier

01A01-9703-JV-00116

Originating Judge:John B. Melton
Cannon County Court of Appeals 10/31/97
Dan Lomax vs. JMCGH

02A01-9706-CH-00116

Originating Judge:Joe C. Morris
Madison County Court of Appeals 10/31/97
Christopher v. Sockwell

01S01-9703-CV-00047
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. At the trial, the only issue was the extent of the claimant's permanent partial disability. In this appeal, the employer's insurer, Argonaut, contends the trial judge (1) erred in accepting the opinion testimony of an examining physician over that of the treating physician and (2) erred in using a multiplier of 4.9 times the medical impairment to determine the claimant's permanent partial disability. As discussed below, the panel has found no reversible error but concluded the award of permanent partial disability benefits should be modified. The employee or claimant, Atkins, is forty-four years old with a college degree in social science work. He has worked as an instructor and hearing officer with the state of Tennessee, as a supervisor with the United States Department of Commerce, as a machine operator and as a forklift operator. On April 18, 1994, Atkins stepped off a forklift and fell, injuring his back and bruising his right side from his shoulder to his foot. He was referred to Dr. David McCord, who performed disc surgery at L4-5 on May 23, 1994. When the claimant's condition did not improve, the doctor performed fusion surgery. At the time of the trial on August 31, 1996, the fusion had not healed and the claimant had not been released by Dr. McCord to return to work. The doctor assessed the claimant's permanent impairment at fifteen percent to the whole body. At the claimant's request, Dr. David W. Gaw conducted a physical examination of the claimant and assessed his permanent impairment at eighteen percent to the whole body. At the insurer's request, Dr. Michael James McNamara conducted a physical examination and assessed his permanent impairment at ten percent to the whole body. From the testimony of the claimant, which the trial judge found to be credible, and the other evidence, the trial judge found the opinion testimony of Dr. Gaw to be "the most convincing." He then multiplied the eighteen percent impairment by 4.9, after stating, "I agree with counsel that the multipliers 5 and 6 are out," and awarded permanent partial disability benefits based on 88.2% to the body as a whole. Appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6- 225(e)(2). This tribunal is required to conduct an independent examination of the record to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. James E. Walton,
Montgomery County Workers Compensation Panel 10/31/97
Roxie Moorehead v. Lincoln & Donalson Care Center

01S01-9703-CV-00049
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The issue is this case is whether the replacement of the plaintiff's right knee was causally related to a compensable accident within the purview of applicable law. The trial judge found the issue in favor of the plaintiff and awarded benefits based upon a determination that she had an 85 percent permanent partial disability to her right leg. The employer appeals, insisting that the judgment is contrary to the preponderance of the evidence. Our review of the findings of fact made by the trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the finding, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. TENN. CODE ANN. _ 5-6-225(e)(2); Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 584 (Tenn. 1991). The plaintiff is a 62 year old woman of limited education and skills. She was employed as a nursing technician1 at the Care Center where she began work in 1991. On April 17, 1994, a patient whom she was attending kicked her right knee, which caused momentary pain. She continued to work for three weeks during which time her knee became stiff and painful. She was seen by Dr. Michael Siaw, an orthopedic specialist who recommended conservative treatment. She did not respond, and Dr. Siaw scheduled her for a MRI which revealed an oblique tear of the lateral meniscus. Dr. Siaw believed this injury was consonant with the history the plaintiff gave him of having been kicked on the knee by a patient at the nursing home. Eventually, it became necessary to correct the tear arthroscopically. This procedure was performed on July 5, 1994, and successfully so, although pre- existing osteoarthritis continued to cause the plaintiff considerable pain. The plaintiff returned to work, and the arthritic condition worsened, according to her. Dr. Siaw saw her on June 21, 1996 and discovered that she had a total knee replacement 1 Being a nursing technician involves lifting, bathing, feeding, and dressing patients. 2
Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge
Originating Judge:Hon. Lee Russell,
Moore County Workers Compensation Panel 10/31/97
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Court of Appeals 10/30/97
State vs. Christopher McBride

01C01-9610-CC-00437

Originating Judge:J. S. Daniel
Rutherford County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/30/97
01CO1-9607-CC-00296

01CO1-9607-CC-00296
Montgomery County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/30/97
Edward Nesbitt vs. State

01C01-9611-CR-00491
Robert L. Smith, Jr. vs. Judge Sterling Gray, Warden Howard Carlton, and State of Tennessee

Originating Judge:Ann Lacy Johns
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/30/97
William Joseph Hayes

01C01-9608-CC-00351
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/30/97
State vs. Patrick Lewis, II, Patrick Lewis and Donna Lewis

01C01-9608-CC-00378
Williamson County Court of Criminal Appeals 10/30/97