APPELLATE COURT OPINIONS

Please enter some keywords to search.
State of Tennessee v. Raffell M. Griffin, Jr.

E2022-00659-CCA-R3-CD

The Defendant, Raffell M. Griffin, Jr., was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess
with the intent to sell or deliver more than twenty-six grams of cocaine in a drug-free
zone, a Class B felony, and first degree premeditated murder. See T.C.A. §§ 39-17-
417(c) (2018) (subsequently amended) (possession of a controlled substance), 39-12-103
(2018) (conspiracy), 39-13-202(a)(2) (2018) (subsequently amended) (first degree
murder). The jury found that the Defendant committed a criminal gang offense,
enhancing by one level the felony classification of the convictions. See id. § 40-35-121
(2019) (subsequently amended) (gang enhancement). The trial court imposed a twentyfive
year sentence for the conspiracy conviction, to be served consecutively with a life
sentence for the murder conviction. On appeal, the Defendant contends that: (1) the
evidence is insufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction for first degree murder; (2)
the trial court erred in admitting hearsay evidence; (3) the trial court erred by allowing
Investigator Philip Jinks to testify as an expert in gang investigations; (4) the trial court
failed to conduct an adequate investigation of alleged juror misconduct; and (5) the trial
court failed to apply mitigating factors in sentencing. We affirm the judgments of the
trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Kyle A. Hixson
Knox County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/12/23
Mechelle Hollis Ex Rel. Nicole N. Et Al v. Manuel M. Sanchez

M2022-01190-COA-R3-CV

After a car accident, a plaintiff sued a defendant, but never served him with process.  Almost two years later, the defendant moved to dismiss the case as time-barred.  The plaintiff opposed the dismissal and moved for an enlargement of time to serve the defendant.  The court denied the requested enlargement and dismissed the case.  We affirm.

Authoring Judge: Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge:Judge Thomas W. Brothers
Davidson County Court of Appeals 09/12/23
In Re Estate of Charles Leonard Welch

M2023-00118-COA-R3-CV

This appeal arises from a will contest by the decedent’s children. Counsel for the contestants and counsel for the executrix engaged in settlement negotiations on behalf of their clients. The executrix submitted a motion to enforce the settlement. After an evidentiary hearing on the motion, the Probate Court granted the motion and entered an order of voluntary dismissal of the contestants’ claims with prejudice. The contestants appeal. We affirm.

Authoring Judge: Judge Carma Dennis McGee
Originating Judge:Judge Andra J. Hedrick
Davidson County Court of Appeals 09/11/23
State of Tennessee v. Roger Scott Herbison

M2022-01359-CCA-R3-CD

The Defendant, Roger Scott Herbison, entered a guilty plea to one count of attempted
sexual exploitation of a minor and one count of attempted aggravated sexual exploitation
of a minor in exchange for an effective four-year sentence, suspended to probation, and the
Defendant’s placement on the sex offender registry. As a part of his plea, the Defendant
sought to reserve a certified question of law, concerning whether probable cause existed
for issuance of a search warrant, which was the subject of an unsuccessful suppression
motion. Because the Defendant did not properly reserve a certified issue for review, we
are without jurisdiction to review the merits of the Defendant’s claim, and we dismiss his
appeal.

Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Camille R. McMullen
Originating Judge:Judge David D. Wolfe
Court of Criminal Appeals 09/11/23
State of Tennessee v. Justin L. Kiser

E2023-00093-CCA-R3-PC

The petitioner, Justin L. Kiser, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief,
which petition challenged his five convictions of especially aggravated kidnapping,
alleging that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. Discerning no error,
we affirm the post-conviction court’s denial of post-conviction relief.

Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt
Originating Judge:Judge Zachary R. Walden
Union County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/08/23
McArthur Bobo v. State of Tennessee

W2022-01554-CCA-R3-PC

Petitioner, McArthur Bobo, appeals the summary dismissal of his pro se petition for postconviction
relief. Discerning no error, we affirm.

Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
Originating Judge:Judge Chris Craft
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/08/23
State of Tennessee v. Antonio Donte Jenkins, a.k.a. Antonio Donte Gordon Jenkins

M2022-00693-CCA-R3-CD

A Davidson County jury convicted the Defendant, Antonio Donte Jenkins, a.k.a. Antonio Donte Gordon Jenkins, of second degree murder and felony reckless endangerment. The trial court sentenced the Defendant to serve an effective sentence of twenty-seven years. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction for second degree murder. He also asserts that the trial court erred by (1) instructing the jury on criminal responsibility; (2) failing to declare a mistrial after a State’s witness testified that the Defendant had an outstanding warrant; (3) allowing portions of a witness’s testimony from the juvenile transfer hearing to be read into evidence; (4) allowing evidence that had not been presented during trial into the jury room during deliberations; and (5) imposing an excessive sentence. We respectfully conclude that the jury should not have been instructed on criminal responsibility and that the error was not harmless. For this reason, we vacate the Defendant’s conviction for second degree murder and remand for a new trial. Finally, although we also affirm the Defendant’s conviction and sentence for reckless endangerment, we remand for entry of an amended judgment reflecting that this sentence is not currently aligned consecutively to any other sentence.

Authoring Judge: Judge Tom Greenholtz
Originating Judge:Judge Angelita Blackshear Dalton
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/08/23
State of Tennessee v. Johnathan Issac Gradell Allen

M2022-01400-CCA-R3-CD

Johnathan Issac Gradell Allen, Defendant, pleaded guilty to arson and was sentenced to four-and-one-half years’ incarceration. Defendant claims that the trial court erred by not sentencing him to an alternative sentence and by imposing an excessive sentence. Defendant also claims that the State’s negligent handling of certain sentencing documents caused an unreasonable delay in his transfer from the jail to prison thereby delaying the date of his parole hearing. After a thorough review of the record, applicable law, and the briefs, we affirm.

Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Forest A. Durard, Jr.
Lincoln County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/08/23
State of Tennessee v. Roger Jay Hollowell

W2022-01434-CCA-R3-CD

The defendant, Roger Jay Hollowell, appeals the Carroll County Circuit Court’s order
revoking his community corrections sentence and ordering him to serve in confinement the
balance of his sentence for his guilty-pleaded conviction of possession of .5 grams or more
of methamphetamine with intent to deliver. Discerning no error, we affirm.

Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Bruce Irwin Griffey
Carroll County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/08/23
Rodney Earl Jones v. State of Tennessee

M2022-01315-CCA-R3-PC

The petitioner, Rodney Earl Jones, appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, arguing the post-conviction court erred in finding he received the effective assistance of counsel at trial. Following our review, we affirm the denial of the petition.

Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Originating Judge:Judge Angelita Blackshear Dalton
Davidson County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/08/23
State of Tennessee v. Deshaun Tate

W2022-01671-CCA-R3-CD

A Shelby County jury convicted Defendant, Deshaun “Bushwick” Tate, of first degree
premeditated murder. On appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his
motion for judgment of acquittal, his motion for new trial, and his motion to suppress
witness identification. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
Originating Judge:Judge James Jones, Jr.
Shelby County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/07/23
Cole Bryan Howell, III v. United Rentals (North America), Inc., Et Al.

E2023-00170-COA-R3-CV

The plaintiff appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the defendants in this action.
The trial court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims for false arrest, false imprisonment,
intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligence as barred by the statute of
limitations. The trial court also dismissed the plaintiff’s claim for malicious prosecution
after finding the plaintiff could not establish that the defendants had initiated the issuance
of a criminal warrant without probable cause and with malice. Discerning no error, we
affirm the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge W. McClarty
Originating Judge:Judge William T. Ailor
Knox County Court of Appeals 09/07/23
In Re Jayla S.

M2022-01492-COA-R3-PT

The parents of Jayla S. appeal the termination of their parental rights. Jayla was removed from her parents’ custody because Jayla tested positive for amphetamines at birth. The Department of Children’s Services (“DCS”) subsequently filed a petition to terminate both parents’ parental rights. Following a two-day trial, the trial court found that multiple grounds for termination had been proven, including the ground of severe child abuse. Finding it also to be in the best interest of Jayla that her parents’ parental rights be terminated, the court terminated both parents’ parental rights. This appeal followed. Finding no error, we affirm.

Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Frank G. Clement
Originating Judge:Judge N. Andy Myrick
Lincoln County Court of Appeals 09/07/23
Roger Fulmer et al. v. Sarco, GP d/b/a Sarco et al.

M2022-01479-COA-R3-CV

This is an action to recover amounts due under a promissory note. The trial court awarded the plaintiffs $50,000.00 in compensatory damages, attorney’s fees of one-third of that amount, and prejudgment interest on both the compensatory damages and attorney’s fees. We affirm the trial court’s judgment that the individual defendants are individually liable on the obligation and that the ad damnum clause permitted the plaintiffs to recover $50,000.00 in compensatory damages, plus attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest. We vacate the attorney’s fees award and remand for a determination of the plaintiffs’ reasonable attorney’s fees. We reverse the award of prejudgment interest on the attorney’s fees award only. Affirmed in part, vacated in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge Joe Thompson
Sumner County Court of Appeals 09/07/23
Kellum Williams v. State of Tennessee

M2022-01496-CCA-R3-PC

Petitioner, Kellum Williams, appeals as of right from the Montgomery County Circuit Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, wherein he challenged his convictions for first degree premeditated murder, first degree felony murder, and especially aggravated kidnapping and resulting sentence of life without the possibility of parole plus twenty-five years. Petitioner contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel based upon trial counsel’s failure to: (1) sufficiently emphasize at trial the theory that the victim died in Montgomery County rather than in Robertson County, as testified to by the State’s experts; (2) seek an independent expert “to test samples from the crime scene”; (3) raise as a defense that venue of the trial should have been in Robertson County instead of Montgomery County; and (4) more extensively question witnesses to demonstrate Petitioner’s “non-participation in the events leading to [the victim’s] death.” Petitioner further asserts that he is entitled to relief based upon cumulative error. Following a thorough review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Originating Judge:Judge Robert Bateman
Montgomery County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/07/23
State of Tennessee v. Isaiah Harris

E2023-00078-CCA-R3-CD

Defendant, Isaiah Harris, appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probationary sentence
for four counts of attempted second-degree murder and two counts of felony reckless
endangerment and ordering him to serve the balance of his sentence in confinement.
Following our de novo review of the entire record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm
the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Jill Bartee Ayers
Originating Judge:Judge G. Scott Green
Knox County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/07/23
Alsco, Inc. v. Tennessee Department of Revenue

M2022-01019-COA-R3-CV

A taxpayer who rented hygienically-clean textiles to its customers challenged the revocation of three industrial machinery tax exemption certificates that it had previously been issued. An administrative judge determined that the taxpayer was not entitled to the exemption because the taxpayer’s operations did not constitute “manufacturing” as they were not necessary for processing tangible personal property. The taxpayer appealed to the Chancery Court for Davidson County. The chancery court reversed after concluding that the administrative decision was not supported by substantial and material evidence. Discerning no error, we affirm the chancery court’s decision.

Authoring Judge: Judge Andy D. Bennett
Originating Judge:Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle
Davidson County Court of Appeals 09/06/23
Clint Earl Sims v. State of Tennessee

W2022-01597-CCA-R3-PC

Petitioner, Clint Earl Sims, appeals from the Madison County Circuit Court’s order denying him post-conviction relief. On appeal, Petitioner argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel when he pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated assault, three counts of domestic assault, three counts of vandalism less than $1,000, one count of false imprisonment, and one count of violating an order of protection. Petitioner also argues counsel’s ineffective assistance rendered his guilty plea unknowing and involuntary. Following our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we conclude Petitioner’s appeal is untimely, the interest of justice does not favor waiver of the untimely notice, and therefore, this appeal is dismissed.

Authoring Judge: Judge Matthew J. Wilson
Originating Judge:Judge Kyle C. Atkins
Madison County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/06/23
Alsco, Inc. v. Tennessee Department of Revenue- Dissenting

M2022-01019-COA-R3-CV

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. As the majority notes, an administrative judge determined that the taxpayer’s sanitizing operations in this case do not constitute “manufacturing” as they are not “processing” tangible personal property. The administrative judge reasoned that a taxpayer is required to show that its activity fundamentally changes or transforms the property from the state or form in which it originally existed. Applying that standard, the administrative judge found that the state or form of the linens has not been changed or altered by the cleaning, as they remain the same linens before and after.

Authoring Judge: Judge Carma Dennis McGee
Originating Judge:Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle
Davidson County Court of Appeals 09/06/23
State of Tennessee v. Riki Kale Moss

E2022-01227-CCA-R3-CD

In 2020, the Defendant, Riki Kale Moss, was indicted for violation of the implied consent law, driving under the influence (“DUI”) by impairment, and DUI, per se. The Defendant filed a pretrial motion to suppress the evidence resulting from the traffic stop of his vehicle. The trial court granted the Defendant’s motion, and the State filed a motion to reconsider on the grounds that law enforcement had probable cause to stop the Defendant’s vehicle. The trial court issued a revised order denying the motion to suppress, and a jury convicted the Defendant of DUI by impairment and DUI per se. The Defendant appeals the denial of his motion to suppress and also contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. After review, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Originating Judge:Judge Don W. Poole
Hamilton County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/05/23
Patrece Edwards-Bradford v. Kellogg Company, et al.

W2022-01097-SC-R3-WC

Employee Patrece Edwards-Bradford filed a petition for benefit determination seeking permanent disability benefits for an alleged back injury. The Court of Workers' Compensation Claims denied Employee's claim, finding that she had not rebutted the presumption of correctness afforded to the causation and impairment opinions of her authorized treating physicians, and was therefore not entitled to permanent disability benefits. Employee has appealed, and the appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel for consideration and a report of findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 51. We affirm.

Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Thomas J. Wright
Originating Judge:Judge Deana C. Seymour
Workers Compensation Panel 09/05/23
Monica A. Davalos (Dale) v. Douglas C. Dale

E2022-00859-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Originating Judge:Judge W. Jeffrey Hollingsworth
Hamilton County Court of Appeals 09/01/23
State of Tennessee v. Christopher David Pace

W2022-01092-CCA-R3-CD

Defendant, Christopher David Pace, entered a partially open plea in which the length of his
sentence was agreed upon. The trial court would determine the manner of service at a
separate sentencing hearing. On appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court erred because
it relied only upon a “Specific Data Report” in sentencing Defendant. Alternatively,
Defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Defendant’s request
for alternative sentencing. The State concedes that it was reversible error for the trial court
to sentence Defendant without a presentence report. We find that the trial court erred in
failing to consider the validated risk and needs assessment as required by Tennessee Code
Annotated section 40-35-210(b)(8). However, we conclude that the issue is waived. We
further conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Defendant’s
request for alternative sentencing. We accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
Originating Judge:Judge Kyle C. Atkins
Henderson County Court of Criminal Appeals 09/01/23
Chad Aaron Reagan v. Rachel Bogart Reagan

E2023-00499-COA-R3-CV

The March 9, 2023 order from which the appellant has appealed was not effectively
entered. Therefore, there is no final appealable judgment, and this Court lacks jurisdiction
to consider this appeal.

Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Originating Judge:Judge Carter Scott Moore
Court of Appeals 08/31/23
Susan M. Austin v. Tommy Joe Richmond

W2022-00559-COA-R3-JV

Mother appeals the trial court’s order dismissing her petition for civil contempt and
awarding Father a money judgment and his attorney’s fees. Because the trial court failed
to conduct an evidentiary hearing, we conclude that there was no evidence before it from
which to make a ruling. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand
with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing on all issues in this case.

Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge:Judge James P. Gallagher
Fayette County Court of Appeals 08/31/23