COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

TN. Real Estate Comm. vs. Hamilton 01A01-9707-CH-00320 Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
Coastcom, Inc. vs. Cruzen, et.ux. 01A01-9707-CH-00349 Trial Court Judge: H. Denmark Bell	Williamson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
Hawkins & Gossett vs. Hart, et. al. 01A01-9707-CV-00294 Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
J.B. Hinson, et. ux. vs. Beechview Corp. 01A01-9709-CH-00498 Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Jones	Wayne	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
Dept. of Children's Svcs. vs. Stanfill 01A01-9710-JV-00616 Trial Court Judge: Andrew J. Shookhoff	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
Montague vs. Dept. of Corrections 01A01-9711-CH-00667 Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
Charles Montague, v. Tennessee Department of Corrections, and Warden Howard Carlton 01A01-9711-CH-00667 Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle The plaintiff, a prisoner in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Correction, brought this action against the Department and its Commissioner seeking a declaratory judgment that he is entitled to a refund of $64.00 charged against his custodial account for a key lost by the prisoner.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
National Healthcare L.P. vs. Sparta Medical Investors 01A01-9712-CH-00718 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
National Healthcare L.P. vs. Sparta Medical Investors 01A01-9712-CH-00718		Court of Appeals	05/29/98
Ogilvie vs. Metro Gov't. vs. Nashille Electric Svc. 01A01-9709-CV-00466 Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Brothers	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
McMahan vs. Whisman 01A01-9711-CH-00681 Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
Moore, et. ux. vs. Phillips, Sr. 01A01-9605-CH-00197 Trial Court Judge: Jeffrey F. Stewart	Sequatchie	Court of Appeals	05/29/98
Haren Construction v. Metro Nashville and Davidson County M2002-01135-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle This appeal involves a contract between the Appellant Haren Construction Company, Inc. (HCCI) and the Appellee Metropolitan Government (Metro). The construction company brought suit claiming Metro breached its contract with HCCI in "constructive suspension" of work. In addition the construction company claimed that Metro interfered with the company's contract for equipment supply from a third party. The trial court granted Metro's two motions for summary judgment, the first concerning Metro's alleged liability under the Governmental Tort Liability Act, the second concerning the action for breach of contract. HCCI appeals the grant of summary judgment. We affirm.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/28/98
Miller vs. Willbanks 03A01-9709-CV-00411 Trial Court Judge: John K. Wilson	Hamblen	Court of Appeals	05/28/98
Rubin vs. Rubin 03A01-9711-CV-00502		Court of Appeals	05/28/98
Suntrust Bank vs. Johnson M1997-00202-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr. Trial Court Judge: Ernest B. Pellegrin This appeal involves a dispute between a commercial bank and the Tennessee Department of Revenue regarding the bank's claim for a refund of the sales taxes paid in connection with defaulted retail installment sales contracts purchased from various automobile dealers. After the Department denied its refund claim, the bank sued the Commissioner of Revenue in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking a refund. Both parties eventually sought a summary judgment. The trial court granted the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment after concluding that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the bank's claim. Alternatively, the trial court held that the bank was not entitled to the requested refund because it was not the dealer who originally remitted the sales tax to the Department. We have determined that the trial court erred by determining that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the bank's refund claim. However, we have also determined that the trial court correctly concluded that the bank was not entitled to the requested refund because it was not the dealer who remitted the sales tax at issue.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/26/98
Simmons vs. Russell, et. al. 01A01-9709-CV-00467 Trial Court Judge: James E. Walton	Montgomery	Court of Appeals	05/20/98
Dept. of Children's Svcs. vs. Mangrum 01A01-9709-JV-00530 Trial Court Judge: Andrew J. Shookhoff	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/20/98
Shahrdar vs. Global Housing, Inc. 01A01-9710-CV-00553 Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/20/98
Forbes vs. Wilson Co. Emergency 01A01-9602-CH-00089 Trial Court Judge: C. K. Smith	Wilson	Court of Appeals	05/20/98
Davis v. Erwin 03A01-9707-CV-00247		Court of Appeals	05/20/98
Lawson vs. Lawson 03A01-9709-CH-00406	Claiborne	Court of Appeals	05/20/98
Crittenden vs. Crittenden 03A01-9709-CH-00407		Court of Appeals	05/20/98
Perkins vs. Kirby 03A01-9709-CH-00429		Court of Appeals	05/20/98
Wakefield vs. Crawley 03A01-9707-CH-00290		Court of Appeals	05/19/98