William A. Harvey vs. Lenoir City Utilities Board
|
Court of Appeals | ||
John Constantine, II et al vs. Miller Ind., Inc. et al
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
State ex rel Jerry N. Estes vs. Johnny Dewayne Hicks
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Robert Bowman, et al vs. Gatlinburg Condo Mgt.
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02107-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Davis, et al vs. Eubanks and DHS
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Crowell vs. Brown
|
Humphreys | Court of Appeals | |
Estate of Divinny vs. Wheeler Bonding Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Frances Jean Hernandez v. Philip Andreus Hernandez
The appellant owned an undivided one-third interest in a residence prior to his marriage to the appellee. They occupied the residence for about two years, during which time the evidence reveals that the appellee engaged herself in constant repairs, thereby increasing the liveability and value of the residence. She was awarded 75% of the increase in the value of this residence during the marriage, of which the appellant complains. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Amos vs. Vanderbilt
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-1531-COA-R3-CV
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1999-2339-COA-R3-CV
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9904-CV-00133
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9904-CV-00133
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
Dean vs. Compton
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Timothy V. Bowling, v. Lori Goff, Becky West, and the Johnson City Police Department
The plaintiff, Timothy V. Bowling, filed a complaint in this action on January 16, 1998. His pleading, filed pro se, is entitled "Complaint for Civil Rights Violation," and seeks damages against twopolic officers of the Johnson City Police Department. The Deparmtne is also sued. The complaint is based upon the plaintiff's arrest for domestic violence, an arrest made by the individual defendants on March 16, 1993. It seeks money damages for violations of the plaintiff's civil rights. In the words of the complaint, it seeks to invoke civil rights "[t]hat are indeed protected by both the United States Constitution, as well as the Tennessee Constitution. "The trial court dismissed the complaint becauseit found that the complaint was filed more than one year after the plaintiff's arrest. We affirm.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring
This case involves an application in probate for the fees and expenses of attorneys Mary Katherine Longworth and Peggy J. S. Monger (“the Attorneys”) arising out of their representation of Thomas S. Harvey, the former executor of the Estate of Lillie Mae Porter (“the Estate”). Being dissatisfied with the probate court’s award, the Attorneys appealed. For the reasons stated herein, we vacate the judgment of the lower court and remand for further proceedings. |
Loudon | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Adoption of Brian Dustin Copeland & Savannah Copeland Marie Graham & John Graham vs. Timothy Copeland
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Gavin vs. Gavin
|
Court of Appeals | ||
M1999-00468-COA-R3-CV
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Lilly vs. Lilly
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
State Dept. of Children's Svcs. vs. Hunter
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals |