Thomas G. Honeycutt, and wife Fanny M. Honeycutt, b. Bobby Jerald Price and wife, Betty J. Price
Defendants Bobby Jerald Price and his wife Betty J. Price, appeal a judgment of the Chancery Court for Knox County wherein the Court fixed the boundary line between property owned by them and property owned by Plaintiffs Thomas G. Honeycutt and his wife, Fanny M. Honeycutt, in accorance with the Honeycutts' insistence. (See Appendix.)
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
Marilyn Morgan vs. Velma McCrory
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Deborah Tuggle vs. Shelby Co. Government, et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Tommye Johnson vs. Edward Johnson, Sr.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Nancy Olivieri vs. Paul Oliveri
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Vowell Ventures vs. The City of Martin
|
Weakley | Court of Appeals | |
Kenneth & Bertie Downing vs. City of Memphis
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Brandy Thatcher, b/n/f vs. Bobby Wyatt, et al
|
Haywood | Court of Appeals | |
Georgia Keys vs. Memphis Carwash, Inc.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Gentry vs. Gentry
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Burgess & Carter vs. Mead Johnson
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Nance vs. Nance
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Estate of Edward P. Russell, Deceased
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Portland Utilities Construction v. Chase Creek
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Gozenbach vs. Gozenbach
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Bunch vs. Bunch
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Crum vs. Lawing
|
Greene | Court of Appeals | |
Bell vs. Carter
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Savco vs. Century
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Upper East Tenn. vs. Johnson
|
Court of Appeals | ||
IN RE: The adoption of Brandon Kain Dicus; Scott Steel and Darla Steel v. Maryl Lou Dicus - Concurring
This is an appeal by defendant, Mary Lou Dicus, from the decision of the chancery court to set aside the court’s order of 18 October 1993 which amended the court’s order of adoption filed on 24 August 1993. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows. |
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
George Avery Land and Stella Faye Land v. Buster Crum and Patricia L. Crum - Concurring
The defendants, Buster Crum and wife Patricia L. Crum, have appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court resolving a boundary dispute favorably to the plaintiffs, George Avery Land and wife, Stella Faye Land. The sole issue presented to this Court by the defendants/appellants is: Whether the Chancellor erred by ruling that the common boundary line between the parties’ properties should be surveyed in the course and distance method when there were ample natural objects, landmarks, artificial monuments and lines of adjoining landowners sufficiently describing the common boundary line. |
Sequatchie | Court of Appeals |