COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Thomas G. Honeycutt, and wife Fanny M. Honeycutt, b. Bobby Jerald Price and wife, Betty J. Price
03A01-9610-CH-00329
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Frederick D. McDonald

Defendants Bobby Jerald Price and his wife Betty J. Price, appeal a judgment of the Chancery Court for Knox County wherein the Court fixed the boundary line between property owned by them and property owned by Plaintiffs Thomas G. Honeycutt and his wife, Fanny M. Honeycutt, in accorance with the Honeycutts' insistence. (See Appendix.)

 


 

Knox Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Hamilton Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Scott Court of Appeals

Marilyn Morgan vs. Velma McCrory
02A01-9604-CV-00072
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier

Shelby Court of Appeals

Deborah Tuggle vs. Shelby Co. Government, et al
02A01-9606-CV-00147
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown

Shelby Court of Appeals

Tommye Johnson vs. Edward Johnson, Sr.
02A01-9609-Cv-00217
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown

Shelby Court of Appeals

Nancy Olivieri vs. Paul Oliveri
02A01-9512-CV-00282

Court of Appeals

Vowell Ventures vs. The City of Martin
02A01-9604-CH-00090
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree

Weakley Court of Appeals

Kenneth & Bertie Downing vs. City of Memphis
02A01-9608-CV-00177
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier

Shelby Court of Appeals

Brandy Thatcher, b/n/f vs. Bobby Wyatt, et al
02A01-9605-CH-00114
Trial Court Judge: George R. Ellis

Haywood Court of Appeals

Georgia Keys vs. Memphis Carwash, Inc.
02A01-9605-CV-00113
Trial Court Judge: Kay S. Robilio

Shelby Court of Appeals

Gentry vs. Gentry
01A01-9611-CH-00512
Trial Court Judge: Alex W. Darnell

Montgomery Court of Appeals

Burgess & Carter vs. Mead Johnson
01A01-9609-CV-00436
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins

Coffee Court of Appeals

Nance vs. Nance
01A01-9611-CV-00515
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Davidson Court of Appeals

Estate of Edward P. Russell, Deceased
01A01-9611-PB-00516
Trial Court Judge: John A. Turnbull
Tracy Moore, B/N/F/ Shirley Moore vs. James Prescott, II 02A01-9609-CV-00227 View

Court of Appeals

Portland Utilities Construction v. Chase Creek
M2002-02886-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
A utilities contractor sued a subdivision developer for payment for work it performed on the subdivision's infrastructure. The court found that the developer was obligated to honor its contract by paying for work with a value of $313,829. The court also found that the developer was entitled to an offset of $55,955 for damages resulting from defects in the contractor's performance. The developer argues on appeal that the trial court erroneously declined to grant it additional offsets. We affirm the trial court.

Davidson Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

Gozenbach vs. Gozenbach
03A01-9609-CV-00314

Court of Appeals

Bunch vs. Bunch
03A01-9609-GS-00301

Court of Appeals

Crum vs. Lawing
03A01-9610-CH-00320

Greene Court of Appeals

Bell vs. Carter
03A01-9610-CH-00334

Court of Appeals

Savco vs. Century
03A01-9611-CV-00360

Court of Appeals

Upper East Tenn. vs. Johnson
03A01-9701-CH-00011

Court of Appeals

IN RE: The adoption of Brandon Kain Dicus; Scott Steel and Darla Steel v. Maryl Lou Dicus - Concurring
01-A-01-9611-CH-00502
Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Jim T. Hamilton

This is an appeal by defendant, Mary Lou Dicus, from the decision of the chancery court to set aside the court’s order of 18 October 1993 which amended the court’s order of adoption filed on 24 August 1993. The facts  out of which this matter arose are as follows.

Wayne Court of Appeals

George Avery Land and Stella Faye Land v. Buster Crum and Patricia L. Crum - Concurring
01-A-01-9611-CH-00524
Authoring Judge: Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Jeffrey F. Stewart

The defendants, Buster Crum and wife Patricia L. Crum, have appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court resolving a boundary dispute favorably  to the plaintiffs, George Avery Land and wife, Stella Faye Land. The sole  issue presented to this Court by the defendants/appellants is:  Whether the Chancellor erred by ruling that the common boundary line between the parties’ properties should be surveyed in the course and distance method when there were ample natural objects, landmarks, artificial monuments and lines of adjoining landowners sufficiently describing the common boundary line.

Sequatchie Court of Appeals