01A01-9510-CH-00450
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9507-CH-00146
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
01S01-9509-CR-00151
|
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
01S01-9509-CR-00151
|
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
01S01-9509-CR-00151
|
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
03S01-9603-CV-00033
|
Supreme Court | ||
02A01-9511-CV-00251
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02C01-9411-CC-00245
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9412-CC-00265
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9412-CC-00265
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02S01-9509-CC-00085
|
Supreme Court | ||
02C01-9605-CR-00173
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03A01-9602-JV-00043
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9604-CV-00153
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9605-CH-00162
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02C01-9505-CR-00146
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9507-CR-00179
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9509-CR-00277
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9510-CC-00307
|
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02A01-9607-CV-00156
|
Hardeman | Court of Appeals | |
01S01-9509-CR-00151
|
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
State of Tennessee v. Richard Higgs
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Mario A. Lavender and Eric L. Hobbs
The appellants, Mario A. Lavender and Eric Hobbs, were found guilty of two counts of robbery, a Class C felony, and one count of theft over $1,000, a Class D felony, by a jury of their peers. The trial court found that Lavender was a standard offender and imposed Range I sentences as follows: (1) count 1, robbery, confinement for six (6) years in the Department of Correction, (2) count 2, robbery, confinement for six (6) years in the Department of Correction, and (3) count 4, theft, confinement for four (4) years in the Department of Correction. The trial court found that Hobbs was a multiple offender and imposed the following Range II sentences: (1) count 1, robbery, confinement for ten (10) years in the Department of Correction, (2) count 2, robbery, confinement for ten (10) years in the Department of Correction, and (3) count 4, theft, confinement for four (4) years in the Department of Correction. The trial court ordered that the sentences are to be served consecutively. The effective sentence for Lavender is sixteen (16) years, and the effective sentence for Hobbs is twenty-four (24) years. In this Court, both Lavender and Hobbs contend that the sentences imposed by the trial court are excessive. Hobbs also contends that the trial court committed error of prejudicial dimensions by (a) denying his motion to suppress a statement he made to police and (b) denying his motion in limine, which sought to deny the State of Tennessee the right to use his prior convictions to impeach him if he opted to testify. After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the law applicable to the issues presented for review, it is the opinion of this Court that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
David Hutton v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee - Dissenting
The majority has decided that Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-510 (1994) permits the purchaser of a used jet aircraft to reduce his state tax liability by deducting the value of a previously owned prop-driven aircraft from the purchase price of the jet aircraft. I do not agree that Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-510 applies to the purchase of the jet because the transaction does not involve a trade or series of trades. |
Giles | Court of Appeals | |
David Hutton, v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee - Dissenting
The majority has decided that Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-510 (1994) permits the purchaser of a used jet aircraft to reduce his state tax liability by deducting the value of a previously owned prop-driven aircraft from the purchase price of the jet aircraft. I do not agree that Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-510 applies to the purchase of the jet because the transaction does not involve a trade or series of trades. |
Giles | Court of Appeals |